llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2012-04-02-IndirectBr.ll
Arthur Eubanks d0acd97c68 [NewPM][LoopUnswitch] Pin loop-unswitch to legacy PM or use simple-loop-unswitch
As mentioned in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143395.html,
loop-unswitch has not been ported to the NPM. Instead people are using
simple-loop-unswitch.

Pin all tests in Transforms/LoopUnswitch to legacy PM and replace all
other uses of loop-unswitch with simple-loop-unswitch.

One test that didn't fit into the above was
2014-06-21-congruent-constant.ll which seems to only pass with
loop-unswitch. That is also pinned to legacy PM.

Now all tests containing "-loop-unswitch" anywhere in the test succeed with
NPM turned on by default.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85360
2020-08-06 10:56:00 -07:00

43 lines
1.5 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -verify-memoryssa | FileCheck %s
; PR12343: -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 crash on indirect branch
; CHECK: %0 = icmp eq i64 undef, 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %0, label %"5", label %"4"
; CHECK: "5": ; preds = %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %"16"
; CHECK: "16": ; preds = %"22", %"5"
; CHECK-NEXT: indirectbr i8* undef, [label %"22", label %"33"]
; CHECK: "22": ; preds = %"16"
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %0, label %"16", label %"26"
; CHECK: "26": ; preds = %"22"
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
define void @foo() {
entry:
%0 = icmp eq i64 undef, 0
br i1 %0, label %"5", label %"4"
"4": ; preds = %entry
unreachable
"5": ; preds = %entry
br label %"16"
"16": ; preds = %"22", %"5"
indirectbr i8* undef, [label %"22", label %"33"]
"22": ; preds = %"16"
br i1 %0, label %"16", label %"26"
"26": ; preds = %"22"
unreachable
"33": ; preds = %"16"
unreachable
}