Florian Hahn a2979c8399
[IVDescriptors] Bail out instead of asserting that order is expected.
When dealing with multiple phis that depend on each other, the order
might have been changed and may not match the expectation. If that
happens, bail out, rather than asserting.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54218
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54233
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54254
2022-03-07 19:57:26 +00:00
..
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-02-06 22:18:35 -08:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-02-06 22:18:35 -08:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//