61e29aafa7
We're seeing what we believe are false positives. (It's hard to tell with the available diagnostics, and I'm not sure how to reduce them yet). I'll send Richard reproduction details offline. djasper/chandlerc suggested this should be a warning for now, to make rolling it out feasible. llvm-svn: 293611
72 lines
3.3 KiB
C++
72 lines
3.3 KiB
C++
// RUN: rm -rf %t
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -x c++ -I%S/Inputs/merge-using-decls -verify %s -DORDER=1
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -x c++ -I%S/Inputs/merge-using-decls -verify %s -DORDER=2
|
|
|
|
#if ORDER == 1
|
|
#include "a.h"
|
|
#include "b.h"
|
|
#else
|
|
#include "b.h"
|
|
#include "a.h"
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
struct Y {
|
|
int value; // expected-note 0-1{{target of using}}
|
|
typedef int type; // expected-note 0-1{{target of using}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<typename T> int Use() {
|
|
int k = T().v + T().value; // expected-note 0-2{{instantiation of}}
|
|
typedef typename T::type I;
|
|
typedef typename T::t I;
|
|
typedef int I;
|
|
return k;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template<typename T> int UseAll() {
|
|
return Use<C<T> >() + Use<D<T> >() + Use<E<T> >() + Use<F<T> >(); // expected-note 0-2{{instantiation of}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template int UseAll<YA>();
|
|
template int UseAll<YB>();
|
|
template int UseAll<Y>();
|
|
|
|
// Which of these two sets of diagnostics is chosen is not important. It's OK
|
|
// if this varies with ORDER, but it must be consistent across runs.
|
|
#if ORDER == 1
|
|
// Here, we're instantiating the definition from 'A' and merging the definition
|
|
// from 'B' into it.
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'E::value' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'E::v' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'F::type' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'F::t' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'F::value' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* {{'F::v' from module 'B' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'A'}}
|
|
|
|
// expected-note@a.h:* +{{does not match}}
|
|
#else
|
|
// Here, we're instantiating the definition from 'B' and merging the definition
|
|
// from 'A' into it.
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'D::type' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'D<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'D::value' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'D<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* 2{{'typename' keyword used on a non-type}}
|
|
// expected-error@b.h:* 2{{dependent using declaration resolved to type without 'typename'}}
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'E::type' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'E::t' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'E::value' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'E::v' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'E<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-note@b.h:* 2{{definition has no member}}
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'F::type' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'F::t' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'F::value' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
// expected-error@a.h:* {{'F::v' from module 'A' is not present in definition of 'F<T>' in module 'B'}}
|
|
|
|
// expected-note@b.h:* +{{does not match}}
|
|
// expected-note@b.h:* +{{target of using}}
|
|
#endif
|