31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
45 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
45 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <string>
|
|
|
|
// basic_string(basic_string&&)
|
|
// noexcept(is_nothrow_move_constructible<allocator_type>::value);
|
|
|
|
// This tests a conforming extension
|
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
#include "test_allocator.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
{
|
|
typedef std::string C;
|
|
static_assert(std::is_nothrow_move_constructible<C>::value, "");
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
typedef std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, test_allocator<char>> C;
|
|
static_assert(std::is_nothrow_move_constructible<C>::value, "");
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
typedef std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, limited_allocator<char, 10>> C;
|
|
#if TEST_STD_VER <= 14
|
|
static_assert(!std::is_nothrow_move_constructible<C>::value, "");
|
|
#else
|
|
static_assert( std::is_nothrow_move_constructible<C>::value, "");
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|