ed509fe296
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C declarations. e.g., void func(); becomes void func(void); This is the tenth batch of tests being updated (there are a significant number of other tests left to be updated).
24 lines
886 B
C
24 lines
886 B
C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=limited -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm < %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=GMLT %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=line-directives-only -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=GMLT %s
|
|
// Two variables with same name in separate scope.
|
|
// Radar 8330217.
|
|
int main(void) {
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
int k = 0;
|
|
// CHECK: !DILocalVariable(name: "i"
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: !DILexicalBlock(
|
|
|
|
// Make sure we don't have any more lexical blocks because we don't need them in
|
|
// -gmlt.
|
|
// GMLT-NOT: !DILexicalBlock
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
|
|
j++;
|
|
// CHECK: !DILocalVariable(name: "i"
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: !DILexicalBlock(
|
|
// GMLT-NOT: !DILexicalBlock
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
|
|
k++;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|