
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
52 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
52 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
|
|
|
|
// <map>
|
|
|
|
// class multimap
|
|
|
|
// template<typename K>
|
|
// size_type count(const K& x) const; // C++14
|
|
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
#include <map>
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
|
|
#include "min_allocator.h"
|
|
#include "private_constructor.h"
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
struct Comp {
|
|
using is_transparent = void;
|
|
|
|
bool operator()(const std::pair<int, int> &lhs,
|
|
const std::pair<int, int> &rhs) const {
|
|
return lhs < rhs;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool operator()(const std::pair<int, int> &lhs, int rhs) const {
|
|
return lhs.first < rhs;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool operator()(int lhs, const std::pair<int, int> &rhs) const {
|
|
return lhs < rhs.first;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
std::multimap<std::pair<int, int>, int, Comp> s{
|
|
{{2, 1}, 1}, {{1, 1}, 2}, {{1, 1}, 3}, {{1, 1}, 4}, {{2, 2}, 5}};
|
|
|
|
auto cnt = s.count(1);
|
|
assert(cnt == 3);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|