4a289a93f7
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally, by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue of having to support decorators that can be called with or without arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments, and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation of the decorators can become much simpler Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936 llvm-svn: 260134
62 lines
2.0 KiB
Python
62 lines
2.0 KiB
Python
"""
|
|
Test some more expression commands.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import print_function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
import lldb
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
|
|
|
|
class ExprCommands2TestCase(TestBase):
|
|
|
|
mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
# Call super's setUp().
|
|
TestBase.setUp(self)
|
|
# Find the line number to break for main.c.
|
|
self.line = line_number('main.cpp',
|
|
'// Please test many expressions while stopped at this line:')
|
|
|
|
@expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr24489: Name lookup not working correctly on Windows")
|
|
def test_more_expr_commands(self):
|
|
"""Test some more expression commands."""
|
|
self.build()
|
|
|
|
self.runCmd("file a.out", CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
|
|
|
|
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(self, "main.cpp", self.line, num_expected_locations=1,loc_exact=False)
|
|
|
|
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
# Does static casting work?
|
|
self.expect("expression (int*)argv",
|
|
startstr = "(int *) $0 = 0x")
|
|
# (int *) $0 = 0x00007fff5fbff258
|
|
|
|
# Do anonymous symbols work?
|
|
self.expect("expression ((char**)environ)[0]",
|
|
startstr = "(char *) $1 = 0x")
|
|
# (char *) $1 = 0x00007fff5fbff298 "Apple_PubSub_Socket_Render=/tmp/launch-7AEsUD/Render"
|
|
|
|
# Do return values containing the contents of expression locals work?
|
|
self.expect("expression int i = 5; i",
|
|
startstr = "(int) $2 = 5")
|
|
# (int) $2 = 5
|
|
self.expect("expression $2 + 1",
|
|
startstr = "(int) $3 = 6")
|
|
# (int) $3 = 6
|
|
|
|
# Do return values containing the results of static expressions work?
|
|
self.expect("expression 20 + 3",
|
|
startstr = "(int) $4 = 23")
|
|
# (int) $4 = 5
|
|
self.expect("expression $4 + 1",
|
|
startstr = "(int) $5 = 24")
|
|
# (int) $5 = 6
|