llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/2009-06-14-anonymous-union-init.c
Michael Buch 4497ec293a
[clang][CGRecordLayout] Remove dependency on isZeroSize (#96422)
This is a follow-up from the conversation starting at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809#issuecomment-2173729801

The root problem that motivated the change are external AST sources that
compute `ASTRecordLayout`s themselves instead of letting Clang compute
them from the AST. One such example is LLDB using DWARF to get the
definitive offsets and sizes of C++ structures. Such layouts should be
considered correct (modulo buggy DWARF), but various assertions and
lowering logic around the `CGRecordLayoutBuilder` relies on the AST
having `[[no_unique_address]]` attached to them. This is a
layout-altering attribute which is not encoded in DWARF. This causes us
LLDB to trip over the various LLVM<->Clang layout consistency checks.
There has been precedent for avoiding such layout-altering attributes
from affecting lowering with externally-provided layouts (e.g., packed
structs).

This patch proposes to replace the `isZeroSize` checks in
`CGRecordLayoutBuilder` (which roughly means "empty field with
[[no_unique_address]]") with checks for
`CodeGen::isEmptyField`/`CodeGen::isEmptyRecord`.

**Details**
The main strategy here was to change the `isZeroSize` check in
`CGRecordLowering::accumulateFields` and
`CGRecordLowering::accumulateBases` to use the `isEmptyXXX` APIs
instead, preventing empty fields from being added to the `Members` and
`Bases` structures. The rest of the changes fall out from here, to
prevent lookups into these structures (for field numbers or base
indices) from failing.

Added `isEmptyRecordForLayout` and `isEmptyFieldForLayout` (open to
better naming suggestions). The main difference to the existing
`isEmptyRecord`/`isEmptyField` APIs, is that the `isEmptyXXXForLayout`
counterparts don't have special treatment for `unnamed bitfields`/arrays
and also treat fields of empty types as if they had
`[[no_unique_address]]` (i.e., just like the `AsIfNoUniqueAddr` in
`isEmptyField` does).
2024-07-16 04:59:51 +01:00

20 lines
726 B
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EMPTY
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-windows-msvc -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EMPTY-MSVC
// PR4390
struct sysfs_dirent {
union { struct sysfs_elem_dir { int x; } s_dir; };
unsigned short s_mode;
};
struct sysfs_dirent sysfs_root = { {}, 16877 };
// CHECK: @sysfs_root = {{.*}}global %struct.sysfs_dirent { %union.anon zeroinitializer, i16 16877 }
struct Foo {
union { struct empty {} x; };
unsigned short s_mode;
};
struct Foo foo = { {}, 16877 };
// EMPTY: @foo = {{.*}}global %struct.Foo { i16 16877 }
// EMPTY-MSVC: @foo = {{.*}}global %struct.Foo { [4 x i8] undef, i16 16877 }