llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/function-transitive-change.cppm
Chuanqi Xu dfa7ff97b2 [C++20] [Modules] [Reduced BMI] Combine the signature of used modules
into the current module

Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912. After
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, with reduced BMI, the
BMI can keep unchange if the dependent modules only changes the
implementation (without introduing new decls). However, this is not
strictly correct.

For example:

```
// a.cppm
export module a;
export inline int a() { ... }

// b.cppm
export module b;
import a;
export inline int b() { return a(); }
```

Since both `a()` and `b()` are inline, we need to make sure the BMI of
`b.pcm` will change after the implementation of `a()` changes.

We can't get that naturally since we won't record the body of `a()`
during the writing process. We can't reuse ODRHash here since ODRHash
won't calculate the called function recursively. So ODRHash will be
problematic if `a()` calls other inline functions.

Probably we can solve this by a new hash mechanism. But the safety and
efficiency may a problem too. Here we just combine the hash value of the
used modules conservatively.
2024-05-07 11:41:08 +08:00

95 lines
2.8 KiB
C++

// Test that, in C++20 modules reduced BMI, the implementation detail changes
// in non-inline function may not propagate while the inline function changes
// can get propagate.
//
// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: split-file %s %t
// RUN: cd %t
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/a.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/a.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/a.v1.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/a.v1.pcm
//
// The BMI of A should differ since the different implementation.
// RUN: not diff %t/a.pcm %t/a.v1.pcm &> /dev/null
//
// The BMI of B should change since the dependent inline function changes
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/b.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -fmodule-file=a=%t/a.pcm \
// RUN: -o %t/b.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/b.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -fmodule-file=a=%t/a.v1.pcm \
// RUN: -o %t/b.v1.pcm
// RUN: not diff %t/b.v1.pcm %t/b.pcm &> /dev/null
//
// Test the case with unused partitions.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/M-A.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/M-A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/M-B.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/M-B.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/M.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/M.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partA=%t/M-A.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partB=%t/M-B.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/N.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/N.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partA=%t/M-A.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partB=%t/M-B.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M=%t/M.pcm
//
// Now we change `M-A.cppm` to `M-A.v1.cppm`.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/M-A.v1.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/M-A.v1.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/M.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/M.v1.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partA=%t/M-A.v1.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partB=%t/M-B.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/N.cppm -emit-reduced-module-interface -o %t/N.v1.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partA=%t/M-A.v1.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M:partB=%t/M-B.pcm \
// RUN: -fmodule-file=M=%t/M.v1.pcm
//
// The BMI of N can keep unchanged since the N didn't use the changed partition unit 'M:A'.
// RUN: diff %t/N.v1.pcm %t/N.pcm &> /dev/null
//--- a.cppm
export module a;
export inline int a() {
return 48;
}
//--- a.v1.cppm
export module a;
export inline int a() {
return 50;
}
//--- b.cppm
export module b;
import a;
export inline int b() {
return a();
}
//--- M-A.cppm
export module M:partA;
export inline int a() {
return 43;
}
//--- M-A.v1.cppm
export module M:partA;
export inline int a() {
return 50;
}
//--- M-B.cppm
export module M:partB;
export inline int b() {
return 44;
}
//--- M.cppm
export module M;
export import :partA;
export import :partB;
//--- N.cppm
export module N;
import M;
export inline int n() {
return b();
}