Simon Pilgrim b8652fbcbb [X86] Fold AND(SRL(X,Y),1) -> SETCC(BT(X,Y)) (RECOMMITTED)
As noticed on PR39174, if we're extracting a single non-constant bit index, then try to use BT+SETCC instead to avoid messing around moving the shift amount to the ECX register, using slow x86 shift ops etc.

Recommitted with a fix to ensure we zext/trunc the SETCC result to the original type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122891
2022-04-01 16:59:06 +01:00
..
2022-03-03 13:53:36 -08:00
2022-03-08 13:50:54 +01:00