Fangrui Song bb03cdcb44
RISCV: Remove shouldForceRelocation and unneeded relocations
Follow-up to #140494

`shouldForceRelocation` is conservative and produces redundant
relocations.

For example, RISCVAsmBackend::ForceRelocs (introduced to support mixed
relax/norelax code) leads to redundant relocations in the following
example adapted from #77436

```
.option norelax
j label
// For assembly input, RISCVAsmParser::ParseInstruction sets ForceRelocs (https://reviews.llvm.org/D46423).
// For direct object emission, RISCVELFStreamer sets ForceRelocs (#77436)
.option relax
call foo  // linker-relaxable

.option norelax
j label   // redundant relocation due to ForceRelocs
.option relax

label:
```

Root problem: The `isSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolvedImpl` condition in
MCAssembler::evaluateFixup does not check whether two locations are
separated by a fragment whose size can be indeterminate due to linker
instruction (e.g. MCDataFragment with relaxation, or MCAlignFragment
due to indeterminate start offst).

This patch

* Updates the fragment walk code in
  `attemptToFoldSymbolOffsetDifference` to treat MCRelaxableFragment
  (for --riscv-asm-relax-branches) as fixed size after finishLayout.
* Adds a condition in `addReloc` to complement
  `isSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolvedImpl`.
* Removes the no longer needed `shouldForceRelocation`.

This fragment walk code path handles nicely handles
mixed relax/norelax case from
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/possible-problem-related-to-subtarget-usage/75283
and allows us to remove `MCSubtargetInfo` argument (#73721) as a follow-up.

This fragment walk code should be avoided in the absence of
linker-relaxable fragments within the current section.

Adjust two bolt/test/RISCV tests (#141310)

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140692
2025-05-23 18:44:15 -07:00
..

The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
================================

This directory and its subdirectories contain source code for LLVM,
a toolkit for the construction of highly optimized compilers,
optimizers, and runtime environments.

LLVM is open source software. You may freely distribute it under the terms of
the license agreement found in LICENSE.txt.

Please see the documentation provided in docs/ for further
assistance with LLVM, and in particular docs/GettingStarted.rst for getting
started with LLVM and docs/README.txt for an overview of LLVM's
documentation setup.

If you are writing a package for LLVM, see docs/Packaging.rst for our
suggestions.