llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/for-range-crash.cpp
Richard Smith 58f831d2b3 More robust fix for crash on invalid range-based for statement.
Reliably mark the loop variable declaration in a range for as having an
invalid initializer if anything goes wrong building the initializer. We
previously based this determination on whether an error was emitted,
which is not a reliable signal due to error suppression (during error
recovery etc).

Also, properly mark the variable as having initializer errors rather
than simply marking it invalid. This is necessary to mark any structured
bindings as invalid too.

This generalizes the previous fix in
936ec89e91e2dda8b6110b1fd1f9920509d7a17b.
2020-06-08 13:11:23 -07:00

31 lines
857 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 %s
// Ensure that we don't crash if errors are suppressed by an error limit.
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++17 -ferror-limit=1 %s
error e; // expected-error {{unknown type name}}
template <typename>
class Bar {
Bar<int> *variables_to_modify;
foo() { // expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
for (auto *c : *variables_to_modify)
delete c;
}
};
void foo() {
int a;
struct X; // expected-note {{forward declaration}}
for (X x // expected-error {{incomplete type}}
: a) { // expected-error {{range expression of type 'int'}}
constexpr int n = sizeof(x);
}
struct S { int x, y; };
for (S [x, y] // expected-error {{must be 'auto'}}
: a) { // expected-error {{range expression}}
typename decltype(x)::a b;
}
}