58d18dde5c
This removed the pointless need for extension pragma since it doesn't disable anything properly and it doesn't need to enable anything that is not possible to disable. The change doesn't break existing kernels since it allows to compile more cases i.e. without pragma statements but the pragma continues to be accepted. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100985
20 lines
939 B
Common Lisp
20 lines
939 B
Common Lisp
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple spir-unknown-unknown -finclude-default-header -fdeclare-opencl-builtins -verify -cl-std=CL1.2 -emit-llvm -o - -cl-ext=-all
|
|
|
|
void test_negative() {
|
|
uchar4 ua8, ub8;
|
|
char4 sa8, sb8;
|
|
ushort2 ua16, ub16;
|
|
short2 sa16, sb16;
|
|
uint ur;
|
|
int sr;
|
|
ur = arm_dot(ua8, ub8); // expected-error{{implicit declaration of function 'arm_dot' is invalid in OpenCL}}
|
|
sr = arm_dot(sa8, sb8);
|
|
ur = arm_dot_acc(ua8, ub8, ur); // expected-error{{implicit declaration of function 'arm_dot_acc' is invalid in OpenCL}} //expected-note{{'arm_dot_acc' declared here}}
|
|
sr = arm_dot_acc(sa8, sb8, sr);
|
|
ur = arm_dot_acc(ua16, ub16, ur);
|
|
sr = arm_dot_acc(sa16, sb16, sr);
|
|
ur = arm_dot_acc_sat(ua8, ub8, ur); // expected-error{{implicit declaration of function 'arm_dot_acc_sat' is invalid in OpenCL}} //expected-note{{did you mean 'arm_dot_acc'?}}
|
|
sr = arm_dot_acc_sat(sa8, sb8, sr);
|
|
}
|
|
|