llvm-project/mlir/test/Transforms/loop-fusion-4.mlir
Groverkss 98daa4e425 [MLIR] Fix incorrect removal of source loop in loop fusion
This patch fixes a bug in loop fusion pass where the source loop was removed
even when the fused loop did not cover all iterations of the source loop.

This was because the fast hueristic check for checking if source loop and
fused loop have same iterations did not take into account steps in loop.

Reviewed By: dcaballe, bondhugula

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114164
2021-11-23 02:54:09 +05:30

144 lines
5.6 KiB
MLIR

// RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -affine-loop-fusion="mode=producer" -split-input-file | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PRODUCER-CONSUMER
// RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -affine-loop-fusion="fusion-maximal mode=sibling" -split-input-file | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SIBLING-MAXIMAL
// Part I of fusion tests in mlir/test/Transforms/loop-fusion.mlir.
// Part II of fusion tests in mlir/test/Transforms/loop-fusion-2.mlir
// Part III of fusion tests in mlir/test/Transforms/loop-fusion-3.mlir
// Expects fusion of producer into consumer at depth 4 and subsequent removal of
// source loop.
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-LABEL: func @unflatten4d
func @unflatten4d(%arg1: memref<7x8x9x10xf32>) {
%m = memref.alloc() : memref<5040xf32>
%cf7 = arith.constant 7.0 : f32
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 7 {
affine.for %i1 = 0 to 8 {
affine.for %i2 = 0 to 9 {
affine.for %i3 = 0 to 10 {
affine.store %cf7, %m[720 * %i0 + 90 * %i1 + 10 * %i2 + %i3] : memref<5040xf32>
}
}
}
}
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 7 {
affine.for %i1 = 0 to 8 {
affine.for %i2 = 0 to 9 {
affine.for %i3 = 0 to 10 {
%v0 = affine.load %m[720 * %i0 + 90 * %i1 + 10 * %i2 + %i3] : memref<5040xf32>
affine.store %v0, %arg1[%i0, %i1, %i2, %i3] : memref<7x8x9x10xf32>
}
}
}
}
return
}
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NOT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: return
// -----
// Expects fusion of producer into consumer at depth 2 and subsequent removal of
// source loop.
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-LABEL: func @unflatten2d_with_transpose
func @unflatten2d_with_transpose(%arg1: memref<8x7xf32>) {
%m = memref.alloc() : memref<56xf32>
%cf7 = arith.constant 7.0 : f32
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 7 {
affine.for %i1 = 0 to 8 {
affine.store %cf7, %m[8 * %i0 + %i1] : memref<56xf32>
}
}
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 8 {
affine.for %i1 = 0 to 7 {
%v0 = affine.load %m[%i0 + 8 * %i1] : memref<56xf32>
affine.store %v0, %arg1[%i0, %i1] : memref<8x7xf32>
}
}
return
}
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NOT: affine.for
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: return
// -----
// Expects fusion of producer into consumer at depth 1 and source loop to not
// be removed due to difference in loop steps.
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-LABEL: func @check_src_dst_step
func @check_src_dst_step(%m : memref<100xf32>,
%src: memref<100xf32>,
%out: memref<100xf32>) {
affine.for %i0 = 0 to 100 {
%r1 = affine.load %src[%i0]: memref<100xf32>
affine.store %r1, %m[%i0] : memref<100xf32>
}
affine.for %i2 = 0 to 100 step 2 {
%r2 = affine.load %m[%i2] : memref<100xf32>
affine.store %r2, %out[%i2] : memref<100xf32>
}
return
}
// Check if the fusion did take place as well as that the source loop was
// not removed. To check if fusion took place, the read instruction from the
// original source loop is checked to be in the fused loop.
//
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: affine.for %[[idx_0:.*]] = 0 to 100 {
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: %[[result_0:.*]] = affine.load %[[arr1:.*]][%[[idx_0]]] : memref<100xf32>
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: affine.store %[[result_0]], %{{.*}}[%[[idx_0]]] : memref<100xf32>
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER-NEXT: }
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: affine.for %[[idx_1:.*]] = 0 to 100 step 2 {
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: affine.load %[[arr1]][%[[idx_1]]] : memref<100xf32>
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: }
// PRODUCER-CONSUMER: return
// -----
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-LABEL: func @reduce_add_non_maximal_f32_f32(
func @reduce_add_non_maximal_f32_f32(%arg0: memref<64x64xf32, 1>, %arg1 : memref<1x64xf32, 1>, %arg2 : memref<1x64xf32, 1>) {
%cst_0 = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
%cst_1 = arith.constant 1.000000e+00 : f32
affine.for %arg3 = 0 to 1 {
affine.for %arg4 = 0 to 64 {
%accum = affine.for %arg5 = 0 to 64 iter_args (%prevAccum = %cst_0) -> f32 {
%4 = affine.load %arg0[%arg5, %arg4] : memref<64x64xf32, 1>
%5 = arith.addf %prevAccum, %4 : f32
affine.yield %5 : f32
}
%accum_dbl = arith.addf %accum, %accum : f32
affine.store %accum_dbl, %arg1[%arg3, %arg4] : memref<1x64xf32, 1>
}
}
affine.for %arg3 = 0 to 1 {
affine.for %arg4 = 0 to 64 {
// Following loop trip count does not match the corresponding source trip count.
%accum = affine.for %arg5 = 0 to 32 iter_args (%prevAccum = %cst_1) -> f32 {
%4 = affine.load %arg0[%arg5, %arg4] : memref<64x64xf32, 1>
%5 = arith.mulf %prevAccum, %4 : f32
affine.yield %5 : f32
}
%accum_sqr = arith.mulf %accum, %accum : f32
affine.store %accum_sqr, %arg2[%arg3, %arg4] : memref<1x64xf32, 1>
}
}
return
}
// Test checks the loop structure is preserved after sibling fusion
// since the destination loop and source loop trip counts do not
// match.
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL: %[[cst_0:.*]] = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-NEXT: %[[cst_1:.*]] = arith.constant 1.000000e+00 : f32
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-NEXT: affine.for %[[idx_0:.*]]= 0 to 1 {
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-NEXT: affine.for %[[idx_1:.*]] = 0 to 64 {
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-NEXT: %[[result_1:.*]] = affine.for %[[idx_2:.*]] = 0 to 32 iter_args(%[[iter_0:.*]] = %[[cst_1]]) -> (f32) {
// SIBLING-MAXIMAL-NEXT: %[[result_0:.*]] = affine.for %[[idx_3:.*]] = 0 to 64 iter_args(%[[iter_1:.*]] = %[[cst_0]]) -> (f32) {