llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp
Tres Popp c1fa60b4cd [mlir] Update method cast calls to function calls
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.

Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.

Context:

* https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
* Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443

Implementation:
This follows a previous patch that updated calls
`op.cast<T>()-> cast<T>(op)`. However some cases could not handle an
unprefixed `cast` call due to occurrences of variables named cast, or
occurring inside of class definitions which would resolve to the method.
All C++ files that did not work automatically with `cast<T>()` are
updated here to `llvm::cast` and similar with the intention that they
can be easily updated after the methods are removed through a
find-replace.

See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
for the clang-tidy check that is used and then update printed
occurrences of the function to include `llvm::` before.

One can then run the following:
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy

run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
                 -export-fixes /tmp/cast/casts.yaml mlir/*\
                 -header-filter=mlir/ -fix

rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150348
2023-05-12 11:21:30 +02:00

378 lines
14 KiB
C++

//===- Verifier.cpp - MLIR Verifier Implementation ------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the verify() methods on the various IR types, performing
// (potentially expensive) checks on the holistic structure of the code. This
// can be used for detecting bugs in compiler transformations and hand written
// .mlir files.
//
// The checks in this file are only for things that can occur as part of IR
// transformations: e.g. violation of dominance information, malformed operation
// attributes, etc. MLIR supports transformations moving IR through locally
// invalid states (e.g. unlinking an operation from a block before re-inserting
// it in a new place), but each transformation must complete with the IR in a
// valid form.
//
// This should not check for things that are always wrong by construction (e.g.
// attributes or other immutable structures that are incorrect), because those
// are not mutable and can be checked at time of construction.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "mlir/IR/Verifier.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Attributes.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Dialect.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Dominance.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Operation.h"
#include "mlir/IR/RegionKindInterface.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Threading.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/StringMap.h"
#include "llvm/Support/FormatVariadic.h"
#include "llvm/Support/PrettyStackTrace.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Regex.h"
#include <atomic>
#include <optional>
using namespace mlir;
namespace {
/// This class encapsulates all the state used to verify an operation region.
class OperationVerifier {
public:
/// If `verifyRecursively` is true, then this will also recursively verify
/// nested operations.
explicit OperationVerifier(bool verifyRecursively)
: verifyRecursively(verifyRecursively) {}
/// Verify the given operation.
LogicalResult verifyOpAndDominance(Operation &op);
private:
/// Any ops that have regions and are marked as "isolated from above" will be
/// returned in the opsWithIsolatedRegions vector.
LogicalResult
verifyBlock(Block &block,
SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &opsWithIsolatedRegions);
/// Verify the properties and dominance relationships of this operation.
LogicalResult verifyOperation(Operation &op);
/// Verify the dominance property of regions contained within the given
/// Operation.
LogicalResult verifyDominanceOfContainedRegions(Operation &op,
DominanceInfo &domInfo);
/// A flag indicating if this verifier should recursively verify nested
/// operations.
bool verifyRecursively;
};
} // namespace
LogicalResult OperationVerifier::verifyOpAndDominance(Operation &op) {
// Verify the operation first, collecting any IsolatedFromAbove operations.
if (failed(verifyOperation(op)))
return failure();
// Since everything looks structurally ok to this point, we do a dominance
// check for any nested regions. We do this as a second pass since malformed
// CFG's can cause dominator analysis construction to crash and we want the
// verifier to be resilient to malformed code.
if (op.getNumRegions() != 0) {
DominanceInfo domInfo;
if (failed(verifyDominanceOfContainedRegions(op, domInfo)))
return failure();
}
return success();
}
/// Returns true if this block may be valid without terminator. That is if:
/// - it does not have a parent region.
/// - Or the parent region have a single block and:
/// - This region does not have a parent op.
/// - Or the parent op is unregistered.
/// - Or the parent op has the NoTerminator trait.
static bool mayBeValidWithoutTerminator(Block *block) {
if (!block->getParent())
return true;
if (!llvm::hasSingleElement(*block->getParent()))
return false;
Operation *op = block->getParentOp();
return !op || op->mightHaveTrait<OpTrait::NoTerminator>();
}
LogicalResult OperationVerifier::verifyBlock(
Block &block, SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &opsWithIsolatedRegions) {
for (auto arg : block.getArguments())
if (arg.getOwner() != &block)
return emitError(arg.getLoc(), "block argument not owned by block");
// Verify that this block has a terminator.
if (block.empty()) {
if (mayBeValidWithoutTerminator(&block))
return success();
return emitError(block.getParent()->getLoc(),
"empty block: expect at least a terminator");
}
// Check each operation, and make sure there are no branches out of the
// middle of this block.
for (Operation &op : block) {
// Only the last instructions is allowed to have successors.
if (op.getNumSuccessors() != 0 && &op != &block.back())
return op.emitError(
"operation with block successors must terminate its parent block");
// If we aren't verifying recursievly, there is nothing left to check.
if (!verifyRecursively)
continue;
// If this operation has regions and is IsolatedFromAbove, we defer
// checking. This allows us to parallelize verification better.
if (op.getNumRegions() != 0 &&
op.hasTrait<OpTrait::IsIsolatedFromAbove>()) {
opsWithIsolatedRegions.push_back(&op);
// Otherwise, check the operation inline.
} else if (failed(verifyOperation(op))) {
return failure();
}
}
// Verify that this block is not branching to a block of a different
// region.
for (Block *successor : block.getSuccessors())
if (successor->getParent() != block.getParent())
return block.back().emitOpError(
"branching to block of a different region");
// If this block doesn't have to have a terminator, don't require it.
if (mayBeValidWithoutTerminator(&block))
return success();
Operation &terminator = block.back();
if (!terminator.mightHaveTrait<OpTrait::IsTerminator>())
return block.back().emitError("block with no terminator, has ")
<< terminator;
return success();
}
/// Verify the properties and dominance relationships of this operation,
/// stopping region recursion at any "isolated from above operations". Any such
/// ops are returned in the opsWithIsolatedRegions vector.
LogicalResult OperationVerifier::verifyOperation(Operation &op) {
// Check that operands are non-nil and structurally ok.
for (auto operand : op.getOperands())
if (!operand)
return op.emitError("null operand found");
/// Verify that all of the attributes are okay.
for (auto attr : op.getAttrs()) {
// Check for any optional dialect specific attributes.
if (auto *dialect = attr.getNameDialect())
if (failed(dialect->verifyOperationAttribute(&op, attr)))
return failure();
}
// If we can get operation info for this, check the custom hook.
OperationName opName = op.getName();
std::optional<RegisteredOperationName> registeredInfo =
opName.getRegisteredInfo();
if (registeredInfo && failed(registeredInfo->verifyInvariants(&op)))
return failure();
SmallVector<Operation *> opsWithIsolatedRegions;
if (unsigned numRegions = op.getNumRegions()) {
auto kindInterface = dyn_cast<RegionKindInterface>(op);
// Verify that all child regions are ok.
MutableArrayRef<Region> regions = op.getRegions();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < numRegions; ++i) {
Region &region = regions[i];
RegionKind kind =
kindInterface ? kindInterface.getRegionKind(i) : RegionKind::SSACFG;
// Check that Graph Regions only have a single basic block. This is
// similar to the code in SingleBlockImplicitTerminator, but doesn't
// require the trait to be specified. This arbitrary limitation is
// designed to limit the number of cases that have to be handled by
// transforms and conversions.
if (op.isRegistered() && kind == RegionKind::Graph) {
// Non-empty regions must contain a single basic block.
if (!region.empty() && !region.hasOneBlock())
return op.emitOpError("expects graph region #")
<< i << " to have 0 or 1 blocks";
}
if (region.empty())
continue;
// Verify the first block has no predecessors.
Block *firstBB = &region.front();
if (!firstBB->hasNoPredecessors())
return emitError(op.getLoc(),
"entry block of region may not have predecessors");
// Verify each of the blocks within the region if we are verifying
// recursively.
if (verifyRecursively) {
for (Block &block : region)
if (failed(verifyBlock(block, opsWithIsolatedRegions)))
return failure();
}
}
}
// Verify the nested ops that are able to be verified in parallel.
if (failed(failableParallelForEach(
op.getContext(), opsWithIsolatedRegions,
[&](Operation *op) { return verifyOpAndDominance(*op); })))
return failure();
// After the region ops are verified, run the verifiers that have additional
// region invariants need to veirfy.
if (registeredInfo && failed(registeredInfo->verifyRegionInvariants(&op)))
return failure();
// If this is a registered operation, there is nothing left to do.
if (registeredInfo)
return success();
// Otherwise, verify that the parent dialect allows un-registered operations.
Dialect *dialect = opName.getDialect();
if (!dialect) {
if (!op.getContext()->allowsUnregisteredDialects()) {
return op.emitOpError()
<< "created with unregistered dialect. If this is "
"intended, please call allowUnregisteredDialects() on the "
"MLIRContext, or use -allow-unregistered-dialect with "
"the MLIR opt tool used";
}
return success();
}
if (!dialect->allowsUnknownOperations()) {
return op.emitError("unregistered operation '")
<< op.getName() << "' found in dialect ('" << dialect->getNamespace()
<< "') that does not allow unknown operations";
}
return success();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Dominance Checking
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// Emit an error when the specified operand of the specified operation is an
/// invalid use because of dominance properties.
static void diagnoseInvalidOperandDominance(Operation &op, unsigned operandNo) {
InFlightDiagnostic diag = op.emitError("operand #")
<< operandNo << " does not dominate this use";
Value operand = op.getOperand(operandNo);
/// Attach a note to an in-flight diagnostic that provide more information
/// about where an op operand is defined.
if (auto *useOp = operand.getDefiningOp()) {
Diagnostic &note = diag.attachNote(useOp->getLoc());
note << "operand defined here";
Block *block1 = op.getBlock();
Block *block2 = useOp->getBlock();
Region *region1 = block1->getParent();
Region *region2 = block2->getParent();
if (block1 == block2)
note << " (op in the same block)";
else if (region1 == region2)
note << " (op in the same region)";
else if (region2->isProperAncestor(region1))
note << " (op in a parent region)";
else if (region1->isProperAncestor(region2))
note << " (op in a child region)";
else
note << " (op is neither in a parent nor in a child region)";
return;
}
// Block argument case.
Block *block1 = op.getBlock();
Block *block2 = llvm::cast<BlockArgument>(operand).getOwner();
Region *region1 = block1->getParent();
Region *region2 = block2->getParent();
Location loc = UnknownLoc::get(op.getContext());
if (block2->getParentOp())
loc = block2->getParentOp()->getLoc();
Diagnostic &note = diag.attachNote(loc);
if (!region2) {
note << " (block without parent)";
return;
}
if (block1 == block2)
llvm::report_fatal_error("Internal error in dominance verification");
int index = std::distance(region2->begin(), block2->getIterator());
note << "operand defined as a block argument (block #" << index;
if (region1 == region2)
note << " in the same region)";
else if (region2->isProperAncestor(region1))
note << " in a parent region)";
else if (region1->isProperAncestor(region2))
note << " in a child region)";
else
note << " neither in a parent nor in a child region)";
}
/// Verify the dominance of each of the nested blocks within the given operation
LogicalResult
OperationVerifier::verifyDominanceOfContainedRegions(Operation &op,
DominanceInfo &domInfo) {
for (Region &region : op.getRegions()) {
// Verify the dominance of each of the held operations.
for (Block &block : region) {
// Dominance is only meaningful inside reachable blocks.
bool isReachable = domInfo.isReachableFromEntry(&block);
for (Operation &op : block) {
if (isReachable) {
// Check that operands properly dominate this use.
for (const auto &operand : llvm::enumerate(op.getOperands())) {
if (domInfo.properlyDominates(operand.value(), &op))
continue;
diagnoseInvalidOperandDominance(op, operand.index());
return failure();
}
}
// Recursively verify dominance within each operation in the block, even
// if the block itself is not reachable, or we are in a region which
// doesn't respect dominance.
if (verifyRecursively && op.getNumRegions() != 0) {
// If this operation is IsolatedFromAbove, then we'll handle it in the
// outer verification loop.
if (op.hasTrait<OpTrait::IsIsolatedFromAbove>())
continue;
if (failed(verifyDominanceOfContainedRegions(op, domInfo)))
return failure();
}
}
}
}
return success();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Entrypoint
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
LogicalResult mlir::verify(Operation *op, bool verifyRecursively) {
OperationVerifier verifier(verifyRecursively);
return verifier.verifyOpAndDominance(*op);
}