Douglas Gregor 53a9bdf17e Improve checking of explicit captures in a C++11 lambda expression:
- Actually building the var -> capture mapping properly (there was an off-by-one error)
  - Keeping track of the source location of each capture
  - Minor QoI improvements, e.g, highlighing the prior capture if
  there are multiple captures, pointing at the variable declaration we
  found if we reject it.

As part of this, add standard citations for the various semantic
checks we perform, and note where we're not performing those checks as
we should.

llvm-svn: 149462
2012-02-01 01:18:43 +00:00

25 lines
840 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify
int GlobalVar; // expected-note 2{{declared here}}
namespace N {
int AmbiguousVar; // expected-note {{candidate}}
}
int AmbiguousVar; // expected-note {{candidate}}
using namespace N;
class X0 {
int Member;
static void Overload(int);
void Overload();
virtual X0& Overload(float);
void explicit_capture() {
[&Overload] () {}; // expected-error {{does not name a variable}} expected-error {{not supported yet}}
[&GlobalVar] () {}; // expected-error {{does not have automatic storage duration}} expected-error {{not supported yet}}
[&AmbiguousVar] () {} // expected-error {{reference to 'AmbiguousVar' is ambiguous}} expected-error {{not supported yet}}
[&Globalvar] () {}; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'Globalvar'; did you mean 'GlobalVar}}
}
};