We were assigning the counter for the body of the loop to the loop variable initialization for some reason here, but our tests completely lacked coverage for range-for loops. This fixes that and makes the logic generally more similar to the logic for a regular for. llvm-svn: 236277
14 lines
57 B
Plaintext
14 lines
57 B
Plaintext
_Z9range_forv
|
|
0x000000000014a28a
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
4
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
main
|
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
1
|