Andrew Litteken 0c4bbd293e [IRSim] Make sure the first instruction of a block doesn't get missed if it is the first valid instruction in Module.
If an instruction is first legal instruction in the module, and is the only legal instruction in its basic block, it will be ignored by the outliner due to a length check inherited from the older version of the outliner that was restricted to outlining within a single basic block. This removes that check, and updates any tests that broke because of it.

Reviewer: paquette

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120786
2022-03-13 23:13:09 -05:00
..
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-02-06 22:18:35 -08:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//