31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
35 lines
973 B
C++
35 lines
973 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// <tuple>
|
|
|
|
// template <class... Types> class tuple;
|
|
|
|
// template <size_t I, class... Types>
|
|
// struct tuple_element<I, tuple<Types...> >
|
|
// {
|
|
// typedef Ti type;
|
|
// };
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
#include <tuple>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
using T = std::tuple<int, long, void*>;
|
|
using E1 = typename std::tuple_element<1, T &>::type; // expected-error{{undefined template}}
|
|
using E2 = typename std::tuple_element<3, T>::type;
|
|
using E3 = typename std::tuple_element<4, T const>::type;
|
|
// expected-error@__tuple:* 2 {{static_assert failed}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|