d85576d368
Summary: Closing ports was previously done manually, This makes the protocol more error prone as unclosed ports will leak and eventually the locks will run out. I believe the original fear was that the RAII portion would negatively impact code generation but I have not noticed anything significant.
35 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
35 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===-- Loader test to check the RPC interface with the loader ------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "src/__support/GPU/utils.h"
|
|
#include "src/__support/RPC/rpc_client.h"
|
|
#include "test/IntegrationTest/test.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace LIBC_NAMESPACE;
|
|
|
|
static void test_add() {
|
|
uint64_t cnt = gpu::get_lane_id();
|
|
LIBC_NAMESPACE::rpc::Client::Port port =
|
|
LIBC_NAMESPACE::rpc::client.open<LIBC_TEST_INCREMENT>();
|
|
port.send_and_recv(
|
|
[=](LIBC_NAMESPACE::rpc::Buffer *buffer, uint32_t) {
|
|
reinterpret_cast<uint64_t *>(buffer->data)[0] = cnt;
|
|
},
|
|
[&](LIBC_NAMESPACE::rpc::Buffer *buffer, uint32_t) {
|
|
cnt = reinterpret_cast<uint64_t *>(buffer->data)[0];
|
|
});
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(cnt, gpu::get_lane_id() + 1);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(gpu::get_thread_id(), gpu::get_lane_id());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_MAIN(int, char **, char **) {
|
|
test_add();
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|