OPC_Decode is a specialized OPC_TryDecode. The difference between them is that OPC_TryDecode performs a "completeness check", while OPC_Decode asserts that the check passes. The check is just a boolean test, which is nothing compared to the complexity of the decoding process, so there is no point in having a special opcode that optimizes the check.
63 lines
2.6 KiB
TableGen
63 lines
2.6 KiB
TableGen
// RUN: llvm-tblgen -gen-disassembler -I %p/../../../include %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: llvm-tblgen -gen-disassembler --large-decoder-table -I %p/../../../include %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-LARGE
|
|
|
|
// Check that if decoding of an instruction fails and the instruction does not
|
|
// have a complete decoder method that can determine if the bitpattern is valid
|
|
// or not then the decoder tries to find a more general instruction that
|
|
// matches the bitpattern too.
|
|
|
|
include "llvm/Target/Target.td"
|
|
|
|
def archInstrInfo : InstrInfo { }
|
|
|
|
def arch : Target {
|
|
let InstructionSet = archInstrInfo;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class TestInstruction : Instruction {
|
|
let Size = 1;
|
|
let OutOperandList = (outs);
|
|
let InOperandList = (ins);
|
|
field bits<8> Inst;
|
|
field bits<8> SoftFail = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def InstA : TestInstruction {
|
|
let Inst = {0,0,0,0,?,?,?,?};
|
|
let AsmString = "InstA";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def InstB : TestInstruction {
|
|
let Inst = {0,0,0,0,0,0,?,?};
|
|
let AsmString = "InstB";
|
|
let DecoderMethod = "DecodeInstB";
|
|
let hasCompleteDecoder = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: /* 0 */ OPC_CheckField, 4, 4, 0, // if Inst{7-4} != 0x0
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: /* 4 */ OPC_Scope, 8, 0, // end scope at 15
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: /* 7 */ OPC_CheckField, 2, 2, 0, // if Inst{3-2} != 0x0
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: /* 11 */ OPC_Decode, {{[0-9]+}}, {{[0-9]+}}, 0, // Opcode: InstB, DecodeIdx: 0
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: /* 15 */ OPC_Decode, {{[0-9]+}}, {{[0-9]+}}, 1, // Opcode: InstA, DecodeIdx: 1
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: };
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: if (!Check(S, DecodeInstB(MI, insn, Address, Decoder))) { DecodeComplete = false; return MCDisassembler::Fail; }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: unsigned NumToSkip = *Ptr++;
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: NumToSkip |= (*Ptr++) << 8;
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: return NumToSkip;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE: /* 0 */ OPC_CheckField, 4, 4, 0, // if Inst{7-4} != 0x0
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: /* 4 */ OPC_Scope, 8, 0, 0, // end scope at 16
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: /* 8 */ OPC_CheckField, 2, 2, 0, // if Inst{3-2} != 0x0
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: /* 12 */ OPC_Decode, {{[0-9]+}}, {{[0-9]+}}, 0, // Opcode: InstB, DecodeIdx: 0
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: /* 16 */ OPC_Decode, {{[0-9]+}}, {{[0-9]+}}, 1, // Opcode: InstA, DecodeIdx: 1
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: };
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE: if (!Check(S, DecodeInstB(MI, insn, Address, Decoder))) { DecodeComplete = false; return MCDisassembler::Fail; }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE: unsigned NumToSkip = *Ptr++;
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: NumToSkip |= (*Ptr++) << 8;
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: NumToSkip |= (*Ptr++) << 16;
|
|
// CHECK-LARGE-NEXT: return NumToSkip;
|