The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the error node), leading to an assertion failure (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184). This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed. The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should continue being explored. The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker creates an error node. This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs (unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node. This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node). It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously these were optional) to reduce confusion. Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places. This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780 llvm-svn: 247859
149 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
149 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
//==- ExprInspectionChecker.cpp - Used for regression tests ------*- C++ -*-==//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "ClangSACheckers.h"
|
|
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h"
|
|
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
|
|
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
using namespace ento;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
class ExprInspectionChecker : public Checker< eval::Call > {
|
|
mutable std::unique_ptr<BugType> BT;
|
|
|
|
void analyzerEval(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
void analyzerCheckInlined(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
void analyzerWarnIfReached(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
void analyzerCrash(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
|
|
typedef void (ExprInspectionChecker::*FnCheck)(const CallExpr *,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
bool evalCall(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ExprInspectionChecker::evalCall(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const {
|
|
// These checks should have no effect on the surrounding environment
|
|
// (globals should not be invalidated, etc), hence the use of evalCall.
|
|
FnCheck Handler = llvm::StringSwitch<FnCheck>(C.getCalleeName(CE))
|
|
.Case("clang_analyzer_eval", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerEval)
|
|
.Case("clang_analyzer_checkInlined",
|
|
&ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCheckInlined)
|
|
.Case("clang_analyzer_crash", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCrash)
|
|
.Case("clang_analyzer_warnIfReached", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnIfReached)
|
|
.Default(nullptr);
|
|
|
|
if (!Handler)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
(this->*Handler)(CE, C);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static const char *getArgumentValueString(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) {
|
|
if (CE->getNumArgs() == 0)
|
|
return "Missing assertion argument";
|
|
|
|
ExplodedNode *N = C.getPredecessor();
|
|
const LocationContext *LC = N->getLocationContext();
|
|
ProgramStateRef State = N->getState();
|
|
|
|
const Expr *Assertion = CE->getArg(0);
|
|
SVal AssertionVal = State->getSVal(Assertion, LC);
|
|
|
|
if (AssertionVal.isUndef())
|
|
return "UNDEFINED";
|
|
|
|
ProgramStateRef StTrue, StFalse;
|
|
std::tie(StTrue, StFalse) =
|
|
State->assume(AssertionVal.castAs<DefinedOrUnknownSVal>());
|
|
|
|
if (StTrue) {
|
|
if (StFalse)
|
|
return "UNKNOWN";
|
|
else
|
|
return "TRUE";
|
|
} else {
|
|
if (StFalse)
|
|
return "FALSE";
|
|
else
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Invalid constraint; neither true or false.");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerEval(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const {
|
|
const LocationContext *LC = C.getPredecessor()->getLocationContext();
|
|
|
|
// A specific instantiation of an inlined function may have more constrained
|
|
// values than can generally be assumed. Skip the check.
|
|
if (LC->getCurrentStackFrame()->getParent() != nullptr)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (!BT)
|
|
BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug"));
|
|
|
|
ExplodedNode *N = C.generateNonFatalErrorNode();
|
|
if (!N)
|
|
return;
|
|
C.emitReport(
|
|
llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(*BT, getArgumentValueString(CE, C), N));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnIfReached(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const {
|
|
|
|
if (!BT)
|
|
BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug"));
|
|
|
|
ExplodedNode *N = C.generateNonFatalErrorNode();
|
|
if (!N)
|
|
return;
|
|
C.emitReport(llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(*BT, "REACHABLE", N));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCheckInlined(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const {
|
|
const LocationContext *LC = C.getPredecessor()->getLocationContext();
|
|
|
|
// An inlined function could conceivably also be analyzed as a top-level
|
|
// function. We ignore this case and only emit a message (TRUE or FALSE)
|
|
// when we are analyzing it as an inlined function. This means that
|
|
// clang_analyzer_checkInlined(true) should always print TRUE, but
|
|
// clang_analyzer_checkInlined(false) should never actually print anything.
|
|
if (LC->getCurrentStackFrame()->getParent() == nullptr)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (!BT)
|
|
BT.reset(new BugType(this, "Checking analyzer assumptions", "debug"));
|
|
|
|
ExplodedNode *N = C.generateNonFatalErrorNode();
|
|
if (!N)
|
|
return;
|
|
C.emitReport(
|
|
llvm::make_unique<BugReport>(*BT, getArgumentValueString(CE, C), N));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCrash(const CallExpr *CE,
|
|
CheckerContext &C) const {
|
|
LLVM_BUILTIN_TRAP;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ento::registerExprInspectionChecker(CheckerManager &Mgr) {
|
|
Mgr.registerChecker<ExprInspectionChecker>();
|
|
}
|
|
|