Douglas Gregor b8eaf2944b Audit uses of Sema::LookupSingleName for those lookups that are
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.

This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).

llvm-svn: 101419
2010-04-15 23:40:53 +00:00

41 lines
1.2 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// A type-parameter defines its identifier to be a type-name (if
// declared with class or typename) or template-name (if declared with
// template) in the scope of the template declaration.
template<typename T> struct X0 {
T* value;
};
template<template<class T> class Y> struct X1 {
Y<int> value;
};
// [Note: because of the name lookup rules, a template-parameter that
// could be interpreted as either a non-type template-parameter or a
// type-parameter (because its identifier is the name of an already
// existing class) is taken as a type-parameter. For example,
class T { /* ... */ }; // expected-note{{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable}}
int i;
template<class T, T i> struct X2 {
void f(T t)
{
T t1 = i; //template-parameters T and i
::T t2 = ::i; // global namespace members T and i \
// expected-error{{no viable conversion}}
}
};
namespace PR6831 {
namespace NA { struct S; }
namespace NB { struct S; }
using namespace NA;
using namespace NB;
template <typename S> void foo();
template <int S> void bar();
template <template<typename> class S> void baz();
}