llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-constexpr-not-const.cpp
Richard Smith 034185c2f9 The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone in
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.

llvm-svn: 179969
2013-04-21 01:08:50 +00:00

19 lines
607 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1y %s -verify -DCXX1Y
struct X {
constexpr int f(); // @5
int f(); // @6
};
#ifdef CXX1Y
// FIXME: Detect this situation and provide a better recovery.
// expected-error@6 {{class member cannot be redeclared}}
// expected-note@5 {{previous}}
// expected-error@6 {{non-constexpr declaration of 'f' follows constexpr declaration}}
// expected-note@5 {{previous}}
#else
// expected-warning@5 {{'constexpr' non-static member function will not be implicitly 'const' in C++1y; add 'const' to avoid a change in behavior}}
#endif