llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-self-assign.cpp
Chandler Carruth e0cee6a8b0 Implement -Wself-assign, which warns on code such as:
int x = 42;
  x = x;  // Warns here.

The warning avoids macro expansions, templates, user-defined assignment
operators, and volatile types, so false positives are expected to be low.

The common (mis-)use of this code pattern is to silence unused variable
warnings, but a more idiomatic way of doing that is '(void)x;'.
A follow-up to this will add a note and fix-it hint suggesting this
replacement in cases where the StmtExpr consists precisely of the self
assignment.

llvm-svn: 122804
2011-01-04 06:52:15 +00:00

48 lines
922 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign -verify %s
void f() {
int a = 42, b = 42;
a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
b = b; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
a = b;
b = a = b;
a = a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
a = b = b = a;
}
// Dummy type.
struct S {};
void false_positives() {
#define OP =
#define LHS a
#define RHS a
int a = 42;
// These shouldn't warn due to the use of the preprocessor.
a OP a;
LHS = a;
a = RHS;
LHS OP RHS;
#undef OP
#undef LHS
#undef RHS
S s;
s = s; // Not a builtin assignment operator, no warning.
// Volatile stores aren't side-effect free.
volatile int vol_a;
vol_a = vol_a;
volatile int &vol_a_ref = vol_a;
vol_a_ref = vol_a_ref;
}
template <typename T> void g() {
T a;
a = a; // May or may not be a builtin assignment operator, no warning.
}
void instantiate() {
g<int>();
g<S>();
}