
* `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.find/find.pass.cpp` emits a bunch of warnings, all caused by what appears to be intentional code: + Silence MSVC warning C4245: conversion from `'int'` to `'wchar_t'`, signed/unsigned mismatch - Caused by: `test<U>(0, -1);` + Silence MSVC warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from `'int'` to `'bool'` - Caused by: `test<U>(0, -1);` + Silence MSVC warning C4310: cast truncates constant value - Caused by: `test<U>(T(-129), U(-129));` + Silence MSVC warning C4805: `'=='`: unsafe mix of type `'char'` and type `'bool'` in operation - Caused by: `bool expect_match = val == to_find;` * `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.fold/left_folds.pass.cpp` + Silence MSVC warning C4244: 'argument': conversion from `'double'` to `'const int'`, possible loss of data - Caused by `[](int const x, double const y) { return x + y; }` deliberately being given `double`s to truncate. * `libcxx/test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/numeric.ops.midpoint/midpoint.pointer.pass.cpp` + Silence MSVC warnings about C++20 deprecated `volatile`. - Caused by: `runtime_test< volatile T>();`
99 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
99 lines
3.2 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
|
|
|
|
// MSVC warning C5215: a function parameter with a volatile qualified type is deprecated in C++20
|
|
// MSVC warning C5216: a volatile qualified return type is deprecated in C++20
|
|
// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(cl-style-warnings): /wd5215 /wd5216
|
|
|
|
// <numeric>
|
|
|
|
// template <class _Tp>
|
|
// _Tp* midpoint(_Tp* __a, _Tp* __b) noexcept
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
#include <numeric>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
constexpr void constexpr_test()
|
|
{
|
|
constexpr T array[1000] = {};
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(std::midpoint(array, array)), const T*);
|
|
ASSERT_NOEXCEPT( std::midpoint(array, array));
|
|
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array, array) == array, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 1000) == array + 500, "");
|
|
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 9) == array + 4, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 10) == array + 5, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 11) == array + 5, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array + 9, array) == array + 5, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array + 10, array) == array + 5, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::midpoint(array + 11, array) == array + 6, "");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
void runtime_test()
|
|
{
|
|
T array[1000] = {}; // we need an array to make valid pointers
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(std::midpoint(array, array)), T*);
|
|
ASSERT_NOEXCEPT( std::midpoint(array, array));
|
|
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array, array) == array);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 1000) == array + 500);
|
|
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 9) == array + 4);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 10) == array + 5);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array, array + 11) == array + 5);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array + 9, array) == array + 5);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array + 10, array) == array + 5);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint(array + 11, array) == array + 6);
|
|
|
|
// explicit instantiation
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(std::midpoint<T>(array, array)), T*);
|
|
ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(std::midpoint<T>(array, array));
|
|
assert(std::midpoint<T>(array, array) == array);
|
|
assert(std::midpoint<T>(array, array + 1000) == array + 500);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
void pointer_test()
|
|
{
|
|
runtime_test< T>();
|
|
runtime_test<const T>();
|
|
runtime_test< volatile T>();
|
|
runtime_test<const volatile T>();
|
|
|
|
// The constexpr tests are always const, but we can test them anyway.
|
|
constexpr_test< T>();
|
|
constexpr_test<const T>();
|
|
|
|
// GCC 9.0.1 (unreleased as of 2019-03) barfs on this, but we have a bot for it.
|
|
// Uncomment when gcc 9.1 is released
|
|
#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC
|
|
constexpr_test< volatile T>();
|
|
constexpr_test<const volatile T>();
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
pointer_test<char>();
|
|
pointer_test<int>();
|
|
pointer_test<double>();
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|