719bac55df
When parsing MachineMemOperands, MIRParser treated the "align" keyword
the same as "basealign". Really "basealign" should specify the
alignment of the MachinePointerInfo base value, and "align" should
specify the alignment of that base value plus the offset.
This worked OK when the specified alignment was no larger than the
alignment of the offset, but in cases like this it just caused
confusion:
STW killed %18, 4, %stack.1.ap2.i.i :: (store (s32) into %stack.1.ap2.i.i + 4, align 8)
MIRPrinter would never have printed this, with an offset of 4 but an
align of 8, so it must have been written by hand. MIRParser would
interpret "align 8" as "basealign 8", but I think it is better to give
an error and force the user to write "basealign 8" if that is what they
really meant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120400
Change-Id: I7eeeefc55c2df3554ba8d89f8809a2f45ada32d8
This directory contains tests for the MIR file format parser and printer. It was necessary to split the tests across different targets as no single target covers all features available in machine IR. Tests for codegen passes should NOT be here but in test/CodeGen/sometarget. As a rule of thumb this directory should only contain tests using 'llc -run-pass none'.