
Don't try to generate large PIC code for non-ELF targets. Neither COFF nor MachO have relocations for large position independent code, and users have been using "large PIC" code models to JIT 64-bit code for a while now. With this change, if they are generating ELF code, their JITed code will truly be PIC, but if they target MachO or COFF, it will contain 64-bit immediates that directly reference external symbols. For a JIT, that's perfectly fine. llvm-svn: 337740
28 lines
694 B
LLVM
28 lines
694 B
LLVM
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc -code-model=large -relocation-model=static -o - < %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
declare i32 @__CxxFrameHandler3(...)
|
|
|
|
declare void @bar()
|
|
|
|
define void @foo() personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
|
|
entry:
|
|
invoke void @bar()
|
|
to label %exit unwind label %cleanup
|
|
cleanup:
|
|
%c = cleanuppad within none []
|
|
call void @bar() [ "funclet"(token %c) ]
|
|
cleanupret from %c unwind to caller
|
|
exit:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: foo: # @foo
|
|
; CHECK: movabsq $bar, %[[reg:[^ ]*]]
|
|
; CHECK: callq *%[[reg]]
|
|
; CHECK: retq
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: "?dtor$2@?0?foo@4HA":
|
|
; CHECK: movabsq $bar, %[[reg:[^ ]*]]
|
|
; CHECK: callq *%[[reg]]
|
|
; CHECK: retq # CLEANUPRET
|