llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTConcept.cpp
Erich Keane e3d14bee23 [Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept
Discovered by reducing a different problem, we currently assert because
we failed to make the constraint expressions not dependent, since a
RecoveryExpr cannot be transformed.

This patch fixes that, and gets reasonably nice diagnostics by
introducing a concept (hah!) of "ContainsErrors" to the Satisfaction
types, which causes us to treat the candidate as non-viable.

However, just making THAT candidate non-viable would result in choosing
the 'next best' canddiate, which can result in awkward errors, where we
start evaluating a candidate that is not intended to be selected.
Because of this, and to make diagnostics more relevant, we now just
cause the entire lookup to result in a 'no-viable-candidates'.

This means we will only emit the list of candidates, rather than any
cascading failures.
2022-09-26 06:33:48 -07:00

68 lines
2.8 KiB
C++

//===--- ASTConcept.cpp - Concepts Related AST Data Structures --*- C++ -*-===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
///
/// \file
/// \brief This file defines AST data structures related to concepts.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
#include "clang/AST/TemplateBase.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h"
using namespace clang;
ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction(
const ASTContext &C, const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction)
: NumRecords{Satisfaction.Details.size()},
IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, ContainsErrors{
Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} {
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I) {
auto &Detail = Satisfaction.Details[I];
if (Detail.second.is<Expr *>())
new (getTrailingObjects<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>() + I)
UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord{Detail.first,
UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord::second_type(
Detail.second.get<Expr *>())};
else {
auto &SubstitutionDiagnostic =
*Detail.second.get<std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef> *>();
unsigned MessageSize = SubstitutionDiagnostic.second.size();
char *Mem = new (C) char[MessageSize];
memcpy(Mem, SubstitutionDiagnostic.second.data(), MessageSize);
auto *NewSubstDiag = new (C) std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef>(
SubstitutionDiagnostic.first, StringRef(Mem, MessageSize));
new (getTrailingObjects<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>() + I)
UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord{Detail.first,
UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord::second_type(
NewSubstDiag)};
}
}
}
ASTConstraintSatisfaction *
ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(const ASTContext &C,
const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) {
std::size_t size =
totalSizeToAlloc<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>(
Satisfaction.Details.size());
void *Mem = C.Allocate(size, alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction));
return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction);
}
void ConstraintSatisfaction::Profile(
llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const ASTContext &C,
const NamedDecl *ConstraintOwner, ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> TemplateArgs) {
ID.AddPointer(ConstraintOwner);
ID.AddInteger(TemplateArgs.size());
for (auto &Arg : TemplateArgs)
Arg.Profile(ID, C);
}