73ec065604
This reverts commit 289920 (again). I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which version they are. My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting. This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record formats). Sorry for the churn! llvm-svn: 289982
9 lines
297 B
LLVM
9 lines
297 B
LLVM
; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %s.bc | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "a", scope: null, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, expr: !1)
|
|
; CHECK: !1 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 42, DW_OP_stack_value)
|
|
|
|
!named = !{!0}
|
|
|
|
!0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "a", variable: i32 42)
|