Summary: This is a massive patch because it reworks the entire build and everything that depends on it. This is not split up because various bots would fail otherwise. I will attempt to describe the necessary changes here. This patch completely reworks how the GPU build is built and targeted. Previously, we used a standard runtimes build and handled both NVPTX and AMDGPU in a single build via multi-targeting. This added a lot of divergence in the build system and prevented us from doing various things like building for the CPU / GPU at the same time, or exporting the startup libraries or running tests without a full rebuild. The new appraoch is to handle the GPU builds as strict cross-compiling runtimes. The first step required https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81557 to allow the `LIBC` target to build for the GPU without touching the other targets. This means that the GPU uses all the same handling as the other builds in `libc`. The new expected way to build the GPU libc is with `LLVM_LIBC_RUNTIME_TARGETS=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa;nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`. The second step was reworking how we generated the embedded GPU library by moving it into the library install step. Where we previously had one `libcgpu.a` we now have `libcgpu-amdgpu.a` and `libcgpu-nvptx.a`. This patch includes the necessary clang / OpenMP changes to make that not break the bots when this lands. We unfortunately still require that the NVPTX target has an `internal` target for tests. This is because the NVPTX target needs to do LTO for the provided version (The offloading toolchain can handle it) but cannot use it for the native toolchain which is used for making tests. This approach is vastly superior in every way, allowing us to treat the GPU as a standard cross-compiling target. We can now install the GPU utilities to do things like use the offload tests and other fun things. Some certain utilities need to be built with `--target=${LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE}` as well. I think this is a fine workaround as we will always assume that the GPU `libc` is a cross-build with a functioning host. Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81557
The LLVM libc unit test framework
This directory contains a lightweight implementation of a gtest like unit test framework for LLVM libc.
Why not gtest?
While gtest is great, featureful and time tested, it uses the C and C++ standard libraries. Hence, using it to test LLVM libc (which is also an implementation of the C standard libraries) causes various kinds of mixup/conflict problems.
How is it different from gtest?
LLVM libc's unit test framework is much less featureful as compared to gtest. But, what is available strives to be exactly like gtest.
Will it be made as featureful as gtest in future?
It is not clear if LLVM libc needs/will need every feature of gtest. We only intend to extend it on an as needed basis. Hence, it might never be as featureful as gtest.