31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
32 lines
799 B
C++
32 lines
799 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <functional>
|
|
|
|
// See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20002
|
|
|
|
#include <functional>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
using Fn = std::function<void()>;
|
|
struct S : public std::function<void()> { using function::function; };
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
S s( [](){} );
|
|
S f1( s );
|
|
#if TEST_STD_VER <= 14
|
|
S f2(std::allocator_arg, std::allocator<int>{}, s);
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|