31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
40 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
40 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
|
|
// <numeric>
|
|
|
|
// template <class _Tp>
|
|
// _Tp midpoint(_Tp __a, _Tp __b) noexcept
|
|
|
|
// An overload exists for each of char and all arithmetic types except bool.
|
|
|
|
#include <numeric>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int func1 () { return 1; }
|
|
int func2 () { return 2; }
|
|
|
|
struct Incomplete;
|
|
Incomplete *ip = nullptr;
|
|
void *vp = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
(void) std::midpoint(false, true); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'midpoint'}}
|
|
|
|
// A couple of odd pointer types that should fail
|
|
(void) std::midpoint(nullptr, nullptr); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'midpoint'}}
|
|
(void) std::midpoint(func1, func2); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'midpoint'}}
|
|
(void) std::midpoint(ip, ip); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'midpoint'}}
|
|
(void) std::midpoint(vp, vp); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'midpoint'}}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|