llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/constexpr-array-unknown-bound.cpp
Aaron Ballman 84a3aadf0f Diagnose use of VLAs in C++ by default
Reapplication of 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c with a fix
for a crash involving arrays without a size expression.

Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.

This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
2023-10-20 13:10:03 -04:00

29 lines
1.5 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++1z -fsyntax-only -verify
const extern int arr[];
constexpr auto p = arr; // ok
constexpr int f(int i) {return p[i];} // expected-note {{read of dereferenced one-past-the-end pointer}}
constexpr int arr[] {1, 2, 3};
constexpr auto p2 = arr + 2; // ok
constexpr int x = f(2); // ok
constexpr int y = f(3); // expected-error {{constant expression}}
// expected-note-re@-1 {{in call to 'f({{.*}})'}}
// FIXME: consider permitting this case
struct A {int m[];} a;
constexpr auto p3 = a.m; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{without known bound}}
constexpr auto p4 = a.m + 1; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{without known bound}}
void g(int i) { // expected-note 2{{declared here}}
int arr[i]; // expected-warning {{variable length arrays in C++ are a Clang extension}} \
expected-note {{function parameter 'i' with unknown value cannot be used in a constant expression}}
constexpr auto *p = arr + 2; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{without known bound}}
// FIXME: Give a better diagnostic here. The issue is that computing
// sizeof(*arr2) within the array indexing fails due to the VLA.
int arr2[2][i]; // expected-warning 2{{variable length arrays in C++ are a Clang extension}} \
expected-note {{function parameter 'i' with unknown value cannot be used in a constant expression}}
constexpr int m = ((void)arr2[2], 0); // expected-error {{constant expression}}
}