bd77a26e9a
There were some bugs wrt explicit object parameters in lambdas in the constant evaluator: - The code evaluating a `CXXThisExpr` wasn’t checking for explicit object parameters at all and thus assumed that there was no `this` in the current context because the lambda didn’t have one, even though we were in a member function and had captured its `this`. - The code retrieving captures as lvalues *did* account for explicit object parameters, but it did not handle the case of the explicit object parameter being passed by value rather than by reference. This fixes #80997. --------- Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
35 lines
595 B
C++
35 lines
595 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -verify %s
|
|
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
|
|
|
struct S {
|
|
int i = 42;
|
|
constexpr auto f1() {
|
|
return [this](this auto) {
|
|
return this->i;
|
|
}();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
constexpr auto f2() {
|
|
return [this](this auto&&) {
|
|
return this->i;
|
|
}();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
constexpr auto f3() {
|
|
return [i = this->i](this auto) {
|
|
return i;
|
|
}();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
constexpr auto f4() {
|
|
return [i = this->i](this auto&&) {
|
|
return i;
|
|
}();
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static_assert(S().f1() == 42);
|
|
static_assert(S().f2() == 42);
|
|
static_assert(S().f3() == 42);
|
|
static_assert(S().f4() == 42);
|