llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/flexible-array-member.cpp
isuckatcs e3e9082b01 [analyzer] Fix for incorrect handling of 0 length non-POD array construction
Prior to this patch when the analyzer encountered a non-POD 0 length array,
it still invoked the constructor for 1 element, which lead to false positives.
This patch makes sure that we no longer construct any elements when we see a
0 length array.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131501
2022-08-25 12:42:02 +02:00

59 lines
1.4 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -std=c++11 -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -std=c++17 -verify %s
#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-cxx.h"
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
struct S
{
static int c;
static int d;
int x;
S() { x = c++; }
~S() { d++; }
};
int S::c = 0;
int S::d = 0;
struct Flex
{
int length;
S contents[0];
};
void flexibleArrayMember()
{
S::c = 0;
S::d = 0;
const int size = 4;
Flex *arr =
(Flex *)::operator new(__builtin_offsetof(Flex, contents) + sizeof(S) * size);
clang_analyzer_eval(S::c == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
new (&arr->contents[0]) S;
new (&arr->contents[1]) S;
new (&arr->contents[2]) S;
new (&arr->contents[3]) S;
clang_analyzer_eval(S::c == size); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(arr->contents[0].x == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(arr->contents[1].x == 1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(arr->contents[2].x == 2); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(arr->contents[3].x == 3); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
arr->contents[0].~S();
arr->contents[1].~S();
arr->contents[2].~S();
arr->contents[3].~S();
::operator delete(arr);
clang_analyzer_eval(S::d == size); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}