llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/operator-calls.cpp
isuckatcs b032e3ff61 [analyzer] Evaluate construction of non-POD type arrays
Introducing the support for evaluating the constructor
of every element in an array. The idea is to record the
index of the current array member being constructed and
create a loop during the analysis. We looping over the
same CXXConstructExpr as many times as many elements
the array has.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127973
2022-07-14 23:30:21 +02:00

166 lines
4.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-output=text -verify %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
struct X0 { };
bool operator==(const X0&, const X0&);
// PR7287
struct test { int a[2]; };
void t2() {
test p = {{1,2}};
test q;
q = p;
}
bool PR7287(X0 a, X0 b) {
return operator==(a, b);
}
// Inlining non-static member operators mistakenly treated 'this' as the first
// argument for a while.
struct IntComparable {
bool operator==(int x) const {
return x == 0;
}
};
void testMemberOperator(IntComparable B) {
clang_analyzer_eval(B == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
}
namespace UserDefinedConversions {
class Convertible {
public:
operator int() const {
return 42;
}
operator bool() const {
return true;
}
};
void test(const Convertible &obj) {
clang_analyzer_eval((int)obj == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(obj); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
}
}
namespace RValues {
struct SmallOpaque {
float x;
int operator +() const {
return (int)x;
}
};
struct LargeOpaque {
float x[4];
int operator +() const {
return (int)x[0];
}
};
SmallOpaque getSmallOpaque() {
SmallOpaque obj;
obj.x = 1.0;
return obj;
}
LargeOpaque getLargeOpaque() {
LargeOpaque obj = LargeOpaque();
obj.x[0] = 1.0;
return obj;
}
void test(int coin) {
// Force a cache-out when we try to conjure a temporary region for the operator call.
// ...then, don't crash.
clang_analyzer_eval(+(coin ? getSmallOpaque() : getSmallOpaque())); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
// expected-note@-1{{Assuming 'coin' is 0}}
// expected-note@-2{{'?' condition is false}}
// expected-note@-3{{UNKNOWN}}
// expected-note@-4{{Assuming 'coin' is 0}}
// expected-note@-5{{'?' condition is false}}
clang_analyzer_eval(+(coin ? getLargeOpaque() : getLargeOpaque())); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
// expected-note@-1{{'coin' is 0}}
// expected-note@-2{{'?' condition is false}}
// expected-note@-3{{UNKNOWN}}
}
}
namespace SynthesizedAssignment {
struct A {
int a;
A& operator=(A& other) { a = -other.a; return *this; }
A& operator=(A&& other) { a = other.a+1; return *this; }
};
struct B {
int x;
A a[3];
B& operator=(B&) = default;
B& operator=(B&&) = default;
};
// This used to produce a warning about the iteration variable in the
// synthesized assignment operator being undefined.
//
// Note: The warning we want to avoid can be found in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16745.
// Back in the day, this function was created we couldn't evaluate non-POD type array construction,
// so we couldn't evaluate the copy assignment either, hence we didn't detect that a field is
// uninitialized.
void testNoWarning() {
B v, u;
u = v; // expected-warning@110{{Assigned value is garbage or undefined}}
// expected-note@-1{{Calling defaulted copy assignment operator for 'B'}}
// expected-note@110{{Assigned value is garbage or undefined}}
}
void testNoWarningMove() {
B v, u;
u = static_cast<B &&>(v); // expected-warning@111{{Assigned value is garbage or undefined}}
// expected-note@-1{{Calling defaulted move assignment operator for 'B'}}
// expected-note@111{{Assigned value is garbage or undefined}}
}
void testConsistency() {
B v, u;
v.x = 0;
v.a[0].a = 24;
v.a[1].a = 47;
v.a[2].a = 42;
u = v;
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[0].a == -24); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[1].a == -47); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[2].a == -42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
}
void testConsistencyMove() {
B v, u;
v.x = 0;
v.a[0].a = 24;
v.a[1].a = 47;
v.a[2].a = 42;
u = static_cast<B &&>(v);
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[0].a == 25); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[1].a == 48); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(u.a[2].a == 43); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}
}
}