[libc] Fix non-calls to cpp::is_complex_type_same (#121257)
Some uses were not actually calls, just references to the name.
This commit is contained in:
parent
28ae2ff2a4
commit
70c9152f99
@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ public:
|
|||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, _Complex long double>())
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, _Complex long double>())
|
||||||
return matchComplex<long double>();
|
return matchComplex<long double>();
|
||||||
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT16
|
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT16
|
||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat16>)
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat16>())
|
||||||
return matchComplex<float16>();
|
return matchComplex<float16>();
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT128
|
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT128
|
||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat128>)
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat128>())
|
||||||
return matchComplex<float128>();
|
return matchComplex<float128>();
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ public:
|
|||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, _Complex long double>())
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, _Complex long double>())
|
||||||
return explainErrorComplex<long double>();
|
return explainErrorComplex<long double>();
|
||||||
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT16
|
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT16
|
||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat16>)
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat16>())
|
||||||
return explainErrorComplex<float16>();
|
return explainErrorComplex<float16>();
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT128
|
#ifdef LIBC_TYPES_HAS_CFLOAT128
|
||||||
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat128>)
|
else if constexpr (cpp::is_complex_type_same<T, cfloat128>())
|
||||||
return explainErrorComplex<float128>();
|
return explainErrorComplex<float128>();
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user