Dynamic tls access model will be lowered to MI which clobbers CTR in
the loop in ISEL(ADDItlsgdLADDR) and post-isel CTR loop pass will revert
the loop to a normal compare + branch form.
So no need to add this clobber check in hardware loop insertion pass now.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140367
Passes before hardware loop insertion change the loop to a form which
is not a hardware loop candidate (return early before checking the ctr clobbers).
And the PHI in the loop exit block is also optimized away. This breaks the
previous test point when the case was committed. Fixing this by running this
case just before hardware loop insertion pass.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140366
One of these two changes is exposing (or causing) some more miscompiles.
A reproducer is in progress, so reverting until resolved.
This reverts commit 428f36401b1b695fd501ebfdc8773bed8ced8d4e.
This reverts commit 37b8f09a4b61bf9bf9d0b9017d790c8b82be2e17,
and returns commit 1bd0b82e508d049efdb07f4f8a342f35818df341.
The miscompile was in InstCombine, and it has been addressed.
This tries to approach the problem noted by @arsenm:
terrible codegen for `__builtin_fpclassify()`:
https://godbolt.org/z/388zqdE37
Just because the PHI in the common successor happens to have different
incoming values for these two blocks, doesn't mean we have to give up.
It's quite easy to deal with this, we just need to produce a select:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/000srb
Now, the cost model for this transform is rather overly strict,
so this will basically never fire. We tally all (over all preds)
the selects needed to the NumBonusInsts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139275
This tries to approach the problem noted by @arsenm:
terrible codegen for `__builtin_fpclassify()`:
https://godbolt.org/z/388zqdE37
Just because the PHI in the common successor happens to have different
incoming values for these two blocks, doesn't mean we have to give up.
It's quite easy to deal with this, we just need to produce a select:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/000srb
Now, the cost model for this transform is rather overly strict,
so this will basically never fire. We tally all (over all preds)
the selects needed to the NumBonusInsts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139275
mflr is kind of expensive on Power version smaller than 10, so we should
schedule the store for the mflr's def away from mflr.
In epilogue, the expensive mtlr has no user for its def, so it doesn't
matter that the load and the mtlr are back-to-back.
Reviewed By: RolandF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137423
The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.
Reviewed By: nemanja, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135474
If any PHI nodes in loop exit blocks have incoming values from the
loop that are accesses of TLS variables with local dynamic or general
dynamic TLS model, the address will be computed inside the loop. Since
this includes a call to __tls_get_addr, this will in turn cause the
CTR loops verifier to complain.
Disable CTR loops in such cases.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48527
