The patch also adds expandVPCTLZ and expandVPCTTZ to expand vp.ctlz/cttz nodes
and the cost model of vp.ctlz/cttz.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140370
If the dividend has leading zeros, we can use them to reduce the
size of the multiplier and avoid the fixup cases.
This patch is for scalars only, but we might be able to do this
for vectors in a follow up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140750
We have a version of this transform in InstCombine, but surprisingly not in SDAG. Even more surprisingly, this benefits RISCV, but no other target. This was surprising enough I double checked my build configuration to make sure all targets were enabled; they appear to be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140324
This reverts commit 3010f60381bcd828d1b409cfaa576328bcd05bbc.
This change introduced undefined behaviour (reported at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138508#inline-1352840). Additionally, it
appears to be responsible for a mis-compilation on RISCV64 with the
vector extension (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59594).
The commit message indicates that this is meant to be ARM64 specific
though is a generic selection change.
value() has undesired exception checking semantics and calls
__throw_bad_optional_access in libc++. Moreover, the API is unavailable without
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS on older Mach-O platforms (see
_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS).
This fixes LLVMMIRParser, LLVMGlobalISel, LLVMAsmPrinter, LLVMSelectionDAG.
Reland with a fixup to avoid converting APInts to int64_t which allowed for
overflows (UB) with sufficiently high/low multiplier values.
This allows DemandedBits to see the result of VSCALE will be at most
VScaleMax * some compile-time constant. This relies on the vscale_range()
attribute being present on the function, with a max set. (This is done by
default when clang is targeting AArch64+SVE).
Using this various redundant operations (zexts, sexts, ands, ors, etc)
can be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138508
This allows DemandedBits to see the result of VSCALE will be at most
VScaleMax * some compile-time constant. This relies on the vscale_range()
attribute being present on the function, with a max set. (This is done by
default when clang is targeting AArch64+SVE).
Using this various redundant operations (zexts, sexts, ands, ors, etc)
can be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138508
The patch also adds expandVPCTPOP in TargetLowering to expand VP_CTPOP nodes.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139920
The patch also added function expandVPBITREVERSE to expand ISD::VP_BITREVERSE nodes.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139697
This reverts commit 7883e5b061bdbbe8bee5f479ebe911db5045b7e9.
The original commit was reverted that it didn't update test files after D136263
landed. The recommit fixed those.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139509
The patch made VectorLegalizer expand ISD::VP_FSHL and ISD::VP_FSHR to
achieve the codegen.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138379
(X & Pow2MaskC) == 0 --> (trunc X) >= 0
(X & Pow2MaskC) != 0 --> (trunc X) < 0
This was noted as a regression in the post-commit feedback for D112634
(where we canonicalized IR differently).
For x86, this saves a few instruction bytes. AArch64 seems neutral.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139363
This is a continuation of the series of patches adding lane wise support for scalable vectors in various knownbit-esq routines.
The basic idea here is that we track a single lane for scalable vectors which corresponds to an unknown number of lanes at runtime. This is enough for us to perform lane wise reasoning on many arithmetic operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137190
This allows DemandedBits to see that the SVE count intrinsics (CNTB,
CNTH, CNTW, CNTD) sans multiplier will only ever produce small
positive integers. The maximum value you could get here is 256, which
is CNTB on a machine with a 2048bit vector size (the maximum for SVE).
Using this various redundant operations (zexts, sexts, ands, ors, etc)
can be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138424
A target can return if a misaligned access is 'fast' as defined
by the target or not. In reality there can be different levels
of 'fast' and 'slow'. This patch changes the boolean 'Fast'
argument of the allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses family of functions
to an unsigned representing its speed.
A target can still define it as it wants and the direct translation
of the current code uses 0 and 1 for current false and true. This
makes the change an NFC.
Subsequent patch will start using an actual value of speed in
the load/store vectorizer to compare if a vectorized access going
to be not just fast, but not slower than before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124217
The patch also added function expandVPBSWAP to expand ISD::VP_BSWAP nodes.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137928
We can reuse constants if we use SRL followed by AND and AND followed by SHL.
Similar was done to bitreverse previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138045
We have similar code to translate a demanded elements mask for a shuffle's operands in multiple places - this patch adds a helper function to VectorUtils and updates a number of locations to use it directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136832
This reverts commit 65aaecca8842dec30d03734a7fe8ce33c5afec81.
There was an ordering problem in the calculation of the partial
remainder.
Original commit message:
If the divisor is even, we can first shift the dividend and divisor
right by the number of trailing zeros. Now the divisor is odd and we
can do the original algorithm to calculate a remainder. Then we shift
that remainder left by the number of trailing zeros and add the bits
that were shifted out of the dividend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135541
If the divisor is even, we can first shift the dividend and divisor
right by the number of trailing zeros. Now the divisor is odd and we
can do the original algorithm to calculate a remainder. Then we shift
that remainder left by the number of trailing zeros and add the bits
that were shifted out of the dividend.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135541
The code incorrectly checked for CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF instead of
CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF.
While I was there I flipped the condition into an early out.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136010
If the divisor is even, we can first shift the dividend and divisor
right by the number of trailing zeros. Now the divisor is odd and we
can do the original algorithm to calculate a remainder. Then we shift
that remainder left by the number of trailing zeros and add the bits
that were shifted out of the dividend.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135541
This feature implements support for making entries in the exception section
on XCOFF on the direct assembly path using the ".except" pseudo-op. It also
provides functionality to lower entries (comprised of language and reason
codes) into the exception section through the use of annotation metadata
attached to llvm.ppc.trap/trapd/tw/tdw intrinsics. Integrated assembler
support will be provided in another review. https://reviews.llvm.org/D133030
needs to merge first for LIT tests
Reviewed By: shchenz, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132146
For remainder:
If (1 << (Bitwidth / 2)) % Divisor == 1, we can add the high and low halves
together and use a (Bitwidth / 2) urem. If (BitWidth /2) is a legal integer
type, this urem will be expand by DAGCombiner using multiply by magic
constant. We do have to take into account that adding high and low
together can produce a carry, making it a (BitWidth / 2)+1 bit number.
So we need to also add back in the carry from the first addition.
For division:
We can use the above trick to compute the remainder, subtract that
remainder from the dividend, then multiply by the multiplicative
inverse of the Divisor modulo (1 << BitWidth).
This is based on the section "Remainder by Summing Digits" in
Hacker's delight.
The remainder trick is similar to a trick you may have learned for
determining if a decimal number is divisible by 3. You can add all the
digits together and see if the sum is divisible by 3. If you're not sure
if the sum is divisible by 3, you can add its digits together. This
can be repeated until you have a single decimal digit. If that digit
is 3, 6, or 9, then the original number is divisible by 3. This works
because 10 % 3 == 1.
gcc already does this same trick. There are additional tricks gcc
does urem as well as srem, udiv, and sdiv that I plan to add in
future patches.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130862
The way ComputeNumSignBits was being used was only correct if
OuterBitSize is exactly 2x InnerBitSize. Which is always true,
but not obviously so. Comparing ComputeMaxSignificantBits to
InnerBitSize feels more correct.
(ctpop x) == 1 --> (x != 0) && ((x & x-1) == 0)
Adjust the legality check to avoid the poor codegen on AArch64.
We probably only want to use popcount on this pattern when it
is a single instruction.
fixes#57225
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132237
SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits shouldn't be creating general nodes like this - although we allow bitcasts, even general constant folding is avoided.
Removing it causes a number of regressions that need addressing first, but I've added a TODO for now.
This patch adds basic support for a DAG variant of the canCreateUndefOrPoison call and updates DAGCombiner::visitFREEZE to use it, further Opcodes (including target specific Opcodes) can be handled when we have test coverage.
So far, I've left visitFREEZE to just use this for unary nodes (which currently means the existing BITCAST/FREEZE cases) - later patches will add other unary opcodes (with test coverage) and we can also refactor visitFREEZE to support a general number of operands like we do in InstCombinerImpl::pushFreezeToPreventPoisonFromPropagating.
I'm not aware of any vector test freeze coverage so the DemandedElts (and the Depth) args are not being used yet - but they are in place. Similarly we will be able to handle poison generating SDNodeFlags as and when it becomes an issue.
Part of the work for D106675 / PR50468
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130646
This patch emits table lookup in expandCTTZ.
Context -
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113291 transforms set of IR instructions to
cttz intrinsic but there are some targets which does not support CTTZ or
CTLZ. Hence, I generate a table lookup in TargetLowering::expandCTTZ().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128911
Add a method for the various cases where we need to concatenate 2 KnownBits together (BUILD_PAIR and SHIFT_PARTS in particular) - uses the existing APInt::concat 'HiBits.concat(LoBits)' convention
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130557
GetDemandedBits is mainly a wrapper around SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits now, and is only used by DAGCombiner::visitSTORE so I've moved all remaining functionality there.
visitSTORE was making use of this to 'simplify' constants for a trunc-store. Just removing this code left to a mixture of regressions and gains - it came down to whether a target preferred a sign or zero extended constant for materialization/truncation. I've just moved the code over for now, but a next step would be to move this to targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but some targets that override the method expect a basic binop, and might react badly to a store node.....
This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the ISD::SRL source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
This is another step towards removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and just using TargetLowering::SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits.
There a few cases where we end up with extra register moves which I think we can accept in exchange for the increased ILP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804
