Fix the issue that only the server series Tremont processors (Snow Ridge
& Elkhart Lake) can be detected as Tremont, while the client series
(Jasper Lake & Lakefield) will be guessed as Goldmont.
Noted that Lakefield is missing some features compare to other Tremont
processors, but those features are also missing on `FeatureTremont`,
which shouldn't be a problem. Those features are `waitpkg`, `movdiri`
and `movdir64b`.
LLVM currently doesn't build with `-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON` on Solaris:
`libLLVMTargetParser.so` uses `libkstat` functions without linking it.
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: <https://reviews.llvm.org/D158846
```
$ ./bin/clang --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf --print-supported-extensions
<...>
All available -march extensions for ARM
crc
crypto
sha2
aes
dotprod
<...>
```
This follows the format set by RISC-V and AArch64. As for AArch64, ARM
doesn't have versioned extensions like RISC-V does. So there is only 1
column, which contains the name.
Any extension without a "feature" is hidden as these cannot be used with
-march.
The removal started at https://reviews.llvm.org/D50989 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75494 removed the Triple support. Without recognizing
Darwin triples as Mach-O, we will get assertion error in ToolChains/Darwin.h due
to the universal binary mechanism.
Fix#47698
---
This requires fixing many misuses of llc -march= and llvm-mc -arch= (
commits 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449 and 252c42354eca54274ed7b10c32c73c6937478e8b).
Clang implements SPIR-V with both Physical32 and Physical64 addressing
models. This commit adds a new triple value for the Logical
addressing model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155978
This follows the RISC-V work done in
4b40ced4e5ba10b841516b3970e7699ba8ded572.
This uses AArch64's target parser instead. We just list the names,
without the "+" on them, which matches RISC-V's format.
```
$ ./bin/clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu --print-supported-extensions
clang version 18.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 154da8aec20719c82235a6957aa6e461f5a5e030)
Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: <...>
All available -march extensions for AArch64
aes
b16b16
bf16
brbe
crc
crypto
cssc
<...>
```
Since our extensions don't have versions in the same way there's just
one column with the name in.
Any extension without a feature name (including the special "none") is
not listed as those cannot be passed to -march, they're just for the
backend. For example the MTE extension can be added with "+memtag" but
MTE2 and MTE3 do not have feature names so they cannot be added to
-march.
This does not attempt to tackle the fact that clang allows invalid
combinations of AArch64 extensions, it simply lists the possible
options. It's still up to the user to ask for something sensible.
Equally, this has no context of what CPU is being selected. Neither does
the RISC-V option, the user has to be aware of that.
I've added a target parser test, and a high level clang test that checks
RISC-V and AArch64 work and that Intel, that doesn't support this, shows
the correct error.
This is an alternative of D157485 and a pre-feature to support AVX10.
AVX10 Architecture Specification: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784267
AVX10 Technical Paper: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784343
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-design-for-avx10-feature-support/72661
Based on the feedbacks from LLVM and GCC community, we have agreed to
start from supporting `-m[no-]evex512` on existing AVX512 features.
The option `-mno-evex512` can be used with `-mavx512xxx` to build
binaries that can run on both legacy AVX512 targets and AVX10-256.
There're still arguments about what's the expected behavior when this
option as well as `-mavx512xxx` used together with `-mavx10.1-256`. We
decided to defer the support of `-mavx10.1` after we made consensus.
Or furthermore, we start from supporting AVX10.2 and not providing any
AVX10.1 options.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159250
This is an alternative of D157485 and a pre-feature to support AVX10.
AVX10 Architecture Specification: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784267
AVX10 Technical Paper: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784343
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-design-for-avx10-feature-support/72661
Based on the feedbacks from LLVM and GCC community, we have agreed to
start from supporting `-m[no-]evex512` on existing AVX512 features.
The option `-mno-evex512` can be used with `-mavx512xxx` to build
binaries that can run on both legacy AVX512 targets and AVX10-256.
There're still arguments about what's the expected behavior when this
option as well as `-mavx512xxx` used together with `-mavx10.1-256`. We
decided to defer the support of `-mavx10.1` after we made consensus.
Or furthermore, we start from supporting AVX10.2 and not providing any
AVX10.1 options.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159250
After this D108637 and with FreeBSD -current and now 14 dropping support for
CloudABI I think it is time to consider deleting the CloudABI support.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158920
Store the string with the '+' in FeatureInfos. Drop the '+'
at runtime for the users that don't want it.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, FreddyYe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158814
After looking at this further I think the Ananas support should be removed.
They stopped using Clang. There have never been any releases either; as in
source only, and the backend is not maintained.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158946
GCC 12 (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101696) allows
__builtin_cpu_supports("x86-64") (and -v2 -v3 -v4).
This patch ports the feature.
* Add `FEATURE_X86_64_{BASELINE,V2,V3,V4}` to enum ProcessorFeatures,
but keep CPU_FEATURE_MAX unchanged to make
FeatureInfos/FeatureInfos_WithPLUS happy.
* Change validateCpuSupports to allow `x86-64{,-v2,-v3,-v4}`
* Change getCpuSupportsMask to return `std::array<uint32_t, 4>` where
`x86-64{,-v2,-v3,-v4}` set bits `FEATURE_X86_64_{BASELINE,V2,V3,V4}`.
* `target("x86-64")` and `cpu_dispatch(x86_64)` are invalid. Tested by commit 9de3b35ac9159d5bae6e6796cb91e4f877a07189
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59961
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158811
GCC 12 (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101696) allows `arch=x86-64`
`arch=x86-64-v2` `arch=x86-64-v3` `arch=x86-64-v4` in the
target_clones function attribute. This patch ports the feature.
* Set KeyFeature to `x86-64{,-v2,-v3,-v4}` in `Processors[]`, to be used
by X86TargetInfo::multiVersionSortPriority
* builtins: change `__cpu_features2` to an array like libgcc. Define
`FEATURE_X86_64_{BASELINE,V2,V3,V4}` and depended ISA feature bits.
* CGBuiltin.cpp: update EmitX86CpuSupports to handle `arch=x86-64*`.
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55830
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158329
GCC<6.2 has been unsupported since April 2022 (commit 4c72deb613d9d8838785b431facb3eb480fb2f51).
X86TargetParser.cpp has another workaround that the other 2 nearly identical places don't have. Remove them as well.
Reviewed By: arsenm, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158687
As described in [1][2], `-mtune=` is used to select the type of target
microarchitecture, defaults to the value of `-march`. The set of
possible values should be a superset of `-march` values. Currently
possible values of `-march=` and `-mtune=` are `native`, `loongarch64`
and `la464`.
D136146 has supported `-march={loongarch64,la464}` and this patch adds
support for `-march=native` and `-mtune=`.
A new ProcessorModel called `loongarch64` is defined in LoongArch.td
to support `-mtune=loongarch64`.
`llvm::sys::getHostCPUName()` returns `generic` on unknown or future
LoongArch CPUs, e.g. the not yet added `la664`, leading to
`llvm::LoongArch::isValidArchName()` failing to parse the arch name.
In this case, use `loongarch64` as the default arch name for 64-bit
CPUs.
Two preprocessor macros are defined based on user-provided `-march=`
and `-mtune=` options and the defaults.
- __loongarch_arch
- __loongarch_tune
Note that, to work with `-fno-integrated-cc1` we leverage cc1 options
`-target-cpu` and `-tune-cpu` to pass driver options `-march=` and
`-mtune=` respectively because cc1 needs these information to define
macros in `LoongArchTargetInfo::getTargetDefines`.
[1]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/blob/2023.04.20/docs/LoongArch-toolchain-conventions-EN.adoc
[2]: https://github.com/loongson/la-softdev-convention/blob/v0.1/la-softdev-convention.adoc
Reviewed By: xen0n, wangleiat, steven_wu, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824
Don't access leaf 7 subleaf 1 unless subleaf 0 says it is
supported via EAX.
Intel documentation says invalid subleaves return 0. We had been
relying on that behavior instead of checking the max sublef number.
It appears that some Sandy Bridge CPUs return at least the subleaf 0
EDX value for subleaf 1. Best guess is that this is a bug in a
microcode patch since all of the bits we're seeing set in EDX were
introduced after Sandy Bridge was originally released.
This is causing avxvnniint16 to be incorrectly enabled with -march=native
on these CPUs.
Reviewed By: pengfei, anna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156963
This reverts commit c56514f21b2cf08eaa7ac3a57ba4ce403a9c8956. This
commit adds global state that is shared between clang driver and clang
cc1, which is not correct when clang is used with `-fno-integrated-cc1`
option (no integrated cc1). The -march and -mtune option needs to be
properly passed through cc1 command-line and stored in TargetInfo.
As described in [1][2], `-mtune=` is used to select the type of target
microarchitecture, defaults to the value of `-march`. The set of
possible values should be a superset of `-march` values. Currently
possible values of `-march=` and `-mtune=` are `native`, `loongarch64`
and `la464`.
D136146 has supported `-march={loongarch64,la464}` and this patch adds
support for `-march=native` and `-mtune=`.
A new ProcessorModel called `loongarch64` is defined in LoongArch.td
to support `-mtune=loongarch64`.
`llvm::sys::getHostCPUName()` returns `generic` on unknown or future
LoongArch CPUs, e.g. the not yet added `la664`, leading to
`llvm::LoongArch::isValidArchName()` failing to parse the arch name.
In this case, use `loongarch64` as the default arch name for 64-bit
CPUs.
And these two preprocessor macros are defined:
- __loongarch_arch
- __loongarch_tune
[1]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/blob/2023.04.20/docs/LoongArch-toolchain-conventions-EN.adoc
[2]: https://github.com/loongson/la-softdev-convention/blob/v0.1/la-softdev-convention.adoc
Reviewed By: xen0n, wangleiat
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824
As described in [1][2], `-mtune=` is used to select the type of target
microarchitecture, defaults to the value of `-march`. The set of
possible values should be a superset of `-march` values. Currently
possible values of `-march=` and `-mtune=` are `native`, `loongarch64`
and `la464`.
D136146 has supported `-march={loongarch64,la464}` and this patch adds
support for `-march=native` and `-mtune=`.
A new ProcessorModel called `loongarch64` is defined in LoongArch.td
to support `-mtune=loongarch64`.
`llvm::sys::getHostCPUName()` returns `generic` on unknown or future
LoongArch CPUs, e.g. the not yet added `la664`, leading to
`llvm::LoongArch::isValidArchName()` failing to parse the arch name.
In this case, use `loongarch64` as the default arch name for 64-bit
CPUs.
And these two preprocessor macros are defined:
- __loongarch_arch
- __loongarch_tune
[1]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/blob/2023.04.20/docs/LoongArch-toolchain-conventions-EN.adoc
[2]: https://github.com/loongson/la-softdev-convention/blob/v0.1/la-softdev-convention.adoc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155824
