This is a port of the feature that allows the StackProtector pass to omit
checking code for stack canary checks, and rely on SelectionDAG to do it at a
later stage. The reasoning behind this seems to be to prevent the IR checking
instructions from hindering tail-call optimizations during codegen.
Here we allow GlobalISel to also use that scheme. Doing so requires that we
do some analysis using some factored-out code to determine where to generate
code for the epilogs.
Not every case is handled in this patch since we don't have support for all
targets that exercise different stack protector schemes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98200
This reverts commit d95cd81141a4e398e0d3337cb2e6617281d06278.
The selector sometimes leaves unreachable blocks unselected because it uses a
postorder traversal for the block ordering.
With the trap intrinsics now being emitted, these blocks are no longer empty and
the unselected G_INTRINSIC instructions survive past selection. To fix this,
keep track of which blocks are selected and later delete any blocks that weren't
selected.
The delayed stack protector feature which is currently used for SDAG (and thus
allows for more commonly generating tail calls) depends on being able to extract
the tail call into a separate return block. To do this it also has to extract
the vreg->physreg copies that set up the call's arguments, since if it doesn't
then the call inst ends up using undefined physregs in it's new spliced block.
SelectionDAG implementations can do this because they delay emitting register
copies until *after* the stack arguments are set up. GISel however just
processes and emits the arguments in IR order, so stack arguments always end up
last, and thus this breaks the code that looks for any register arg copies that
precede the call instruction.
This patch adds a thunk argument to the assignValueToReg() and custom assignment
hooks. For outgoing arguments, register assignments use this return param to
return a thunk that does the actual generating of the copies. We collect these
until all the outgoing stack assignments have been done and then execute them,
so that the copies (and perhaps some artifacts like G_SEXTs) are placed after
any stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110610
Also remove some redundancy because the source and result
types of any multiply are always the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110926
We were previously just ignoring unreachable, but targets like Darwin want to
keep unreachable instructions as traps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110603
AArch64StorePairSuppress will prevent the creation of LDP's based on
scheduling info. This shouldn't apply when optimizing for size though,
where the size decrease should be considered more important.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110809
The test is generated by script, so we don't really need the regname to
be meaniful here.
AIX doesn't support the reg name option, removing it for now so that we
can reuse the CHECKs for AIX triple as well.
Noticed while investigating the regressions in D110995 - if the RHS element is already zero, then we don't need the corresponding LHS element.
Technically we could also recheck RHS once we have LHS's known zeros, but I haven't seen any missed opportunities from that yet.
This patch fixes the return value of the builtin __builtin_ppc_load2r to
correctly return short instead of int.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110771
This fixes a violation of the wrap flag rules introduced in c4048d8f. This is an alternate fix to D106852.
The basic problem being fixed is that we infer a set of flags which is valid at some inner scope S1 (usually by correctly propagating them from IR), and then (incorrectly) extend them to a SCEV in scope S2 where S1 != S2. This is not in general safe per the wrap flags semantics recently defined.
In this patch, I include a simple inference step to handle the case where we can prove that S2 is the preheader of the loop S1, and that entry into S2 implies execution of S1. See the code for a more detailed explanation.
One worry I have with this patch is that I might be over-fitting what shows up in tests - and thus hiding negative impact we'd see in the real world. My best defense is that the rule used here very closely follows the one used to propagate the flags from IR to the inner add to start with, and thus if one is reasonable, so probably is the other. Curious what others think about that piece.
The test diffs are roughly as expected. Mostly analysis only, with two transform changes. Oddly, the result looks better in the loop-idiom test, and I don't understand the PPC output enough to have tell. Nothing terrible looking though. (For context, without the scope inference peephole, the test delta includes a couple of vectorization tests. Again, not super concerning, but slightly more so.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109845
A <= -1 constant on a compare can be converted to a < 0 operation, which
is usually cheap. If we mark the constant as cheap, preventing hoisting,
we allow that fold to happen even across different blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109360
This patch re-introduces the fix in the commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/66b0cebf7f736 by @yrnkrn
> In DwarfEHPrepare, after all passes are run, RewindFunction may be a dangling
>
> pointer to a dead function. To make sure it's valid, doFinalization nullptrs
> RewindFunction just like the constructor and so it will be found on next run.
>
> llvm-svn: 217737
It seems that the fix was not migrated to `DwarfEHPrepareLegacyPass`.
This patch also updates `llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` to include `-run-twice` to exercise the cleanup. Without this patch `llvm-lit -v llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` fails with
```
-- Testing: 1 tests, 1 workers --
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll (1 of 1)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice < /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -S | /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
Referencing function in another module!
call void @_Unwind_Resume(i8* %ehptr) #1
; ModuleID = '<stdin>'
void (i8*)* @_Unwind_Resume
; ModuleID = '<stdin>'
in function simple_cleanup_catch
LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted!
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice -S
1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<stdin>'.
2. Running pass 'Module Verifier' on function '@simple_cleanup_catch'
#0 0x000056121b570a2c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:569:0
#1 0x000056121b56eb64 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:97:0
#2 0x000056121b56f28e SignalHandler(int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:397:0
#3 0x00007fc7e9b22980 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12980)
#4 0x00007fc7e87d3fb7 raise /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0
#5 0x00007fc7e87d5921 abort /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0
#6 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::raw_svector_ostream::raw_svector_ostream(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:674:0
#7 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:114:0
#8 0x000056121b4e1528 (/home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt+0x29e3528)
#9 0x000056121adfd03f llvm::raw_ostream::operator<<(llvm::StringRef) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:218:0
FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty.
FileCheck command line: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll
--
********************
********************
Failed Tests (1):
LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll
Testing Time: 0.22s
Failed: 1
```
Reviewed By: loladiro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110979
This reverts commit 1f161919065fbfa2b39b8f373553a64b89f826f8.
We're seeing some issues with this internally. It seems that when
the spill is created by register allocation, the GPR doesn't get
allocated and an assertion fires during virtual register rewriting.
The .mir test case contains the spill before register allocation so
register allocation sees it as any other instruction.
PR52040 identified several issues with the HOP(HOP'(X,X),HOP'(Y,Y)) -> HOP(PERMUTE(HOP'(X,Y)),PERMUTE(HOP'(X,Y)) slow-HOP fold.
Not only was there a copy+paste typo when accessing the inner HOP operands, but the (unnecessary) ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith call was missing one use checks.
Now that we have better shuffle combines of HOPs we can just return a new HOP() sequence and not use ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith at all - this actually improved pair_sum_v8i32_v4i32 codegen as it kicks off further shuffle combines.
X86's decomposeMulByConstant never permits mul decomposition to shift+add/sub if the vector multiply is legal.
Unfortunately this isn't great for SSE41+ targets which have PMULLD for vXi32 multiplies, but is often quite slow. This patch proposes to allow decomposition if the target has the SlowPMULLD flag (i.e. Silvermont). We also always decompose legal vXi64 multiplies - even latest IceLake has really poor latencies for PMULLQ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110588
This is a common pattern:
```
%icmp:_(s32) = G_ICMP intpred(eq), ...
%ext:_(s64) = G_ANYEXT %icmp(s32)
%and:_(s64) = G_AND %ext, 1
```
Here's an example: https://godbolt.org/z/T13f6o8zE
This pattern appears because of the following combine in the
LegalizationArtifactCombiner:
```
// zext(trunc x) - > and (aext/copy/trunc x), mask
```
Which kicks in when we widen the result of G_ICMP from 1 bit to 32 bits.
We know that, on AArch64, a scalar G_ICMP will produce 0 or 1. So the result
of `%ext` will always be 0 or 1 as well.
We have some KnownBits combines which eliminate redundant G_ANDs with masks.
These combines don't kick in with G_ANYEXT.
So, if we replace the G_ANYEXT with G_ZEXT in this situation, the KnownBits
based combines can remove the redundant G_AND.
I wasn't sure if it woud be more appropriate to
* Take this route
* Put this in the LegalizationArtifactCombiner.
* Allow 64 bit G_ICMP destinations
I decided on this route because
1) It's simple
2) I'm not sure if philosophically-speaking, we should be handling non-artifact
instructions + target-specific details like TargetBooleanContents in the
LegalizationArtifactCombiner
3) There is a lot of existing code which assumes we only have 32 bit G_ICMP
destinations. So, adding support for 64-bit destinations seems rather invasive
right now. I think that adding support for 64-bit destinations, or modelling
G_ICMP as ADDS/SUBS/etc is probably cleaner long term though.
This gives minor code size savings on all CTMark benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110959
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit extracted loads to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
I've also cleaned up the alignment calculation code - if we have a constant extraction index then the alignment can be based on an offset from the original vector load alignment, but for non-constant indices we should assume the worst (single element alignment only).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110486
In collectTiedOperands, when handling an undef use that is tied to a
def, constrain the dst reg with the actual register class of the src
reg, instead of with the register class from the instructions's
MCInstrDesc. This makes a difference in some AMDGPU test cases like
this, before:
%16:sgpr_96 = INSERT_SUBREG undef %15:sgpr_96_with_sub0_sub1(tied-def 0), killed %11:sreg_64_xexec, %subreg.sub0_sub1
After, without this patch:
undef %16.sub0_sub1:sgpr_96 = COPY killed %11:sreg_64_xexec
This fails machine verification if you force it to run after
TwoAddressInstruction (currently it is disabled) with:
*** Bad machine code: Invalid register class for subregister index ***
- function: s_load_constant_v3i32_align4
- basic block: %bb.0 (0xa011a88)
- instruction: undef %16.sub0_sub1:sgpr_96 = COPY killed %11:sreg_64_xexec
- operand 0: undef %16.sub0_sub1:sgpr_96
Register class SGPR_96 does not fully support subreg index 4
After, with this patch:
undef %16.sub0_sub1:sgpr_96_with_sub0_sub1 = COPY killed %11:sreg_64_xexec
See also svn r159120 which introduced the code to handle tied undef
uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110944
Some vectors require both widening and promotion for their legalization.
This case is not yet handled in getCopyToPartsVector and falls back
on scalarizing by default. BBecause scalable vectors can't easily be
scalarised, we need to implement this in two separate stages:
1. Widen the vector.
2. Promote the vector.
As part of this patch, PromoteIntRes_CONCAT_VECTORS also needed to be
made scalable aware. Instead of falling back on scalarizing the vector
(fixed-width only), each sub-part of the CONCAT vector is promoted,
and the operation is performed on the type with the widest element type,
finally truncating the result to the promoted result type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110646
This consists of 3 compressed instructions, c.not, c.neg, and c.zext.w.
I believe these have been picked up by the Zce effort using different
encodings. I don't think it makes sense to keep them in bitmanip. It
will eventually cause a conflict if/when Zce is implemented in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110871
This patch removes the uneccessary mf/mtvsr generated in conjunction
with xscvdpsxws/xscvdpuxws.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109902
This is a more complex pattern than we handled with the
initial patch for PR51245:
D110342 / 09e71c367af3
We could extend the logic matching to allow a setcc as
one operand and an extract of vector setcc (or even an
arbitrary bool?) as the other.
This adds a few more unpredicated intrinsics to sink splats to, in order
to create more qr instruction variants. Notably this includes
saddsat/uaddsat but also some of the unpredicated mve intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110333
