This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.
I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.
Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561
The file was a duplicate of atomic_support.h in libc++. Since we now
require the libc++ sources in order to build libc++abi, it's OK to
remove this duplication.
Thanks to @chandlerc for noticing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110103
There is a lot more we can do, in particular in <type_traits>, but this
removes some workarounds that were gated on checking a specific compiler
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108923
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
This patch replaces __sync_* with __libcpp_atomic_* and adds a wrapper
function for __atomic_exchange to support _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS.
Reviewers: EricWF, jroelofs, mclow.lists, compnerd
Reviewed By: EricWF, compnerd
Subscribers: compnerd, efriedma, cfe-commits, joerg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35235
llvm-svn: 313694
Summary:
In rL241532, atomic_support.h was added, which provides handling of
atomic operations for libc++. When atomic builtins are not available,
it emits a warning about being unsupported, but it still provides a
number of stubs for the required functions.
However, it misses a stub for `__libcpp_relaxed_store()`. Add it, by
using the same implementation as for `__libcpp_atomic_store()`.
(Note that I encountered this on arm-freebsd, which still defaults to
armv4, and does not have the runtime libcalls to support atomic
builtins. For now, I have simply disabled using them.)
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: theraven, cfe-commits, jroelofs, majnemer, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13051
llvm-svn: 248313
