This reverts commit adaff46d087799072438dd744b038e6fd50a2d78.
Drop the -O3 checks from default-attributes.hip. I don't know why they
are different on some bots but reverting this is far too disruptive.
Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.
Mostly mechanical, but there are some creative test updates. I preferred
to take the changes as-is in tests where the ABI isn't relevant. In
cases where it's more relevant, or the optimize out logic was too
ingrained in the test, I pre-run the optimization. Some cases manually
add attributes to disable inputs.
Currently, a node and its users are added back to the worklist in reverse topological order after it is combined. This diff changes that order to be topological. This is part of a larger migration to get the DAGCombiner to process nodes in topological order.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127115
Currently, a node and its users are added back to the worklist in reverse topological order after it is combined. This diff changes that order to be topological. This is part of a larger migration to get the DAGCombiner to process nodes in topological order.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127115
Add GFX11 test coverage to a bunch of tests where it was easy to do so,
mostly because the checks are autogenerated and/or GFX11 can share the
same checks as GFX10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129295
Move features/bugs checks into the single place
allowsMisalignedMemoryAccessesImpl.
This is mostly NFCI except for the order of selection in couple places.
A separate change may be needed to stop lying about Fast.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123343
It was only handled for FLAT initially because we did not have
unaligned DS instructions lowering. Now it is implemented but
the bug is not handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123338
There is no need to fully scalarize an unaligned operation in
some case, just split it to alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123330
This was inheriting the mesa behavior, and as far as I know nobody is
using opencl kernels with amdpal. The isMesaKernel check was
irrelevant because this property needs to be held for all functions.
Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.
Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.
This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.
Fixes: SWDEV-282962
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777
Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536
Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde
the compilation time and there is no case for which we see any improvement in
performance. This patch removes this pass and its associated test cases from
the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101313
Change-Id: I0599169a7609c19a887f8d847a71e664030cc141
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Both ds_read_b128 and ds_read2_b64 are valid for 128bit 16-byte aligned
loads but the one that will be selected is determined either by the order in
tablegen or by the AddedComplexity attribute. Currently ds_read_b128 has
priority.
While ds_read2_b64 has lower alignment requirements, we cannot always
restrict ds_read_b128 to 16-byte alignment because of unaligned-access-mode
option. This was causing ds_read_b128 to be selected for 8-byte aligned
loads regardles of chosen access mode.
To resolve this we use two patterns for selecting ds_read_b128. One
requires alignment of 16-byte and the other requires
unaligned-access-mode option.
Same goes for ds_write2_b64 and ds_write_b128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92767
Alignment requirements for ds_read/write_b96/b128 for gfx9 and onward are
now the same as for other GCN subtargets. This way we can avoid any
unintentional use of these instructions on systems that do not support dword
alignment and instead require natural alignment.
This also makes 'SH_MEM_CONFIG.alignment_mode == STRICT' the default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87821
Clustering loads has caching benefits, but as far as I know there is no
advantage to clustering stores on any AMDGPU subtargets.
The disadvantage is that it tends to increase register pressure and
restricts scheduling freedom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85530
Do not break down local loads and stores so ds_read/write_b96/b128 in
ISelLowering can be selected on subtargets that support them and if align
requirements allow them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84403
