If we have a pointer AddRec, the maximum increment is
2^(pointer-index-wdith - 1) - 1. This means that if incrementing the
AddRec wraps, the distance between the previously accessed location and
the wrapped location is > 2^(pointer-index-wdith - 1), i.e. if the GEP
for the AddRec is inbounds, this would be poison due to the object being
larger than half the pointer index type space. The poison would be
immediate UB when the memory access gets executed..
Similar reasoning can be applied for decrements.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113126
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
possible pointer-wrap-around concerns, in some cases.
Before this patch, collectConstStridedAccesses (part of interleaved-accesses
analysis) called getPtrStride with [Assume=false, ShouldCheckWrap=true] when
examining all candidate pointers. This is too conservative. Instead, this
patch makes collectConstStridedAccesses use an optimistic approach, calling
getPtrStride with [Assume=true, ShouldCheckWrap=false], and then, once the
candidate interleave groups have been formed, revisits the pointer-wrapping
analysis but only where it matters: namely, in groups that have gaps, and where
the gaps are not at the very end of the group (in which case the loop is
peeled). This second time getPtrStride is called with [Assume=false,
ShouldCheckWrap=true], but this could further be improved to using Assume=true,
once we also add the logic to track that we are not going to meet the scev
runtime checks threshold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25276
llvm-svn: 285517
