Prior to this change, the data layout calculation would not account for
explicitly set `-mabi=elfv2` on `powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu`, a target
that defaults to `elfv1`.
This is loosely inspired by the equivalent ARM / RISC-V code.
`make check-llvm` passes fine for me, though AFAICT all the tests
specify the data layout manually so there isn't really a test for this
and I am not really sure what the best way to go about adding one would
be.
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
This explicitly adds two 3-element vectors to the DataLayout so that
they'll be element-aligned. We need to do this more generally for
vectors, but this unblocks some very common cases.
Workaround for #123968
Summary:
This patch has broken the `libc` build bot. I could work around that but
the changes seem unnecessary.
This reverts commit 9ba844eb3a21d461c3adc7add7691a076c6992fc.
When handling CUDA ELF files via objdump or LLDB, the ELF parser in LLVM
needs to distinguish if an ELF file is sass or not, which requires a
triple for sass to exist in llvm. This patch includes all the necessary
changes for LLDB and objdump to correctly identify these files with the
correct triple.
Clang and other frontends generally need the LLVM data layout string in
order to generate LLVM IR modules for LLVM. MLIR clients often need it
as well, since MLIR users often lower to LLVM IR.
Before this change, the LLVM datalayout string was computed in the
LLVM${TGT}CodeGen library in the relevant TargetMachine subclass.
However, none of the logic for computing the data layout string requires
any details of code generation. Clients who want to avoid duplicating
this information were forced to link in LLVMCodeGen and all registered
targets, leading to bloated binaries. This happened in PR #145899,
which measurably increased binary size for some of our users.
By moving this information to the TargetParser library, we
can delete the duplicate datalayout strings in Clang, and retain the
ability to generate IR for unregistered targets.
This is intended to be a very mechanical LLVM-only change, but there is
an immediately obvious follow-up to clang, which will be prepared
separately.
The vast majority of data layouts are computable with two inputs: the
triple and the "ABI name". There is only one exception, NVPTX, which has
a cl::opt to enable short device pointers. I invented a "shortptr" ABI
name to pass this option through the target independent interface.
Everything else fits. Mips is a bit awkward because it uses a special
MipsABIInfo abstraction, which includes members with codegen-like
concepts like ABI physical registers that can't live in TargetParser. I
think the string logic of looking for "n32" "n64" etc is reasonable to
duplicate. We have plenty of other minor duplication to preserve
layering.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Arsenault <arsenm2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sergei Barannikov <barannikov88@gmail.com>
