MachineFunction keeps a table of variables whose addresses never change
throughout the function. Today, the only kinds of locations it can
handle are stack slots.
However, we could expand this for variables whose address is derived
from the value a register had upon function entry. One case where this
happens is with variables alive across coroutine funclets: these can
be placed in a coroutine frame object whose pointer is placed in a
register that is an argument to coroutine funclets.
```
define @foo(ptr %frame_ptr) {
dbg.declare(%frame_ptr, !some_var,
!DIExpression(EntryValue, <ptr_arithmetic>))
```
This is a patch in a series that aims to improve the debug information
generated by the CoroSplit pass in the context of `swiftasync`
arguments. Variables stored in the coroutine frame _must_ be described
the entry_value of the ABI-defined register containing a pointer to the
coroutine frame. Since these variables have a single location throughout
their lifetime, they are candidates for being stored in the
MachineFunction table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149879
We were iterating over a SmallPtrSet when outputting slot variables.
This is still correct but made the test fail under reverse iteration.
This patch replaces the SmallPtrSet with a SmallVector.
Also remove the "Stack Frame Layout" lines from arm64-opt-remarks-lazy-bfi test,
since those also break under reverse iteration.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142127
Issue #58168 describes the difficulty diagnosing stack size issues
identified by -Wframe-larger-than. For simple code, its easy to
understand the stack layout and where space is being allocated, but in
more complex programs, where code may be heavily inlined, unrolled, and
have duplicated code paths, it is no longer easy to manually inspect the
source program and understand where stack space can be attributed.
This patch implements a machine function pass that emits remarks with a
textual representation of stack slots, and also outputs any available
debug information to map source variables to those slots.
The new behavior can be used by adding `-Rpass-analysis=stack-frame-layout`
to the compiler invocation. Like other remarks the diagnostic
information can be saved to a file in a machine readable format by
adding -fsave-optimzation-record.
Fixes: #58168
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488
Issue #58168 describes the difficulty diagnosing stack size issues
identified by -Wframe-larger-than. For simple code, its easy to
understand the stack layout and where space is being allocated, but in
more complex programs, where code may be heavily inlined, unrolled, and
have duplicated code paths, it is no longer easy to manually inspect the
source program and understand where stack space can be attributed.
This patch implements a machine function pass that emits remarks with a
textual representation of stack slots, and also outputs any available
debug information to map source variables to those slots.
The new behavior can be used by adding `-Rpass-analysis=stack-frame-layout`
to the compiler invocation. Like other remarks the diagnostic
information can be saved to a file in a machine readable format by
adding -fsave-optimzation-record.
Fixes: #58168
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488
