This patch fixes the column symbol resolution when creating a breakpoint
with the `move_to_nearest_code` flag set.
In order to achieve this, the patch adds column information handling in
the `LineTable`'s `LineEntry` finder. After experimenting a little, it
turns out the most natural approach in case of an inaccurate column match,
is to move backward and match the previous `LineEntry` rather than going
forward like we do with simple line breakpoints.
The patch also reflows the function to reduce code duplication.
Finally, it updates the `BreakpointResolver` heuristic to align it with
the `LineTable` method.
rdar://73218201
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101221
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
When dumping the traced instructions in a for loop, like this one
4: for (int a = 0; a < n; a++)
5: do something;
there might be multiple LineEntry objects for line 4, but with different address ranges. This was causing the dump command to dump something like this:
```
a.out`main + 11 at main.cpp:4
[1] 0x0000000000400518 movl $0x0, -0x8(%rbp)
[2] 0x000000000040051f jmp 0x400529 ; <+28> at main.cpp:4
a.out`main + 28 at main.cpp:4
[3] 0x0000000000400529 cmpl $0x3, -0x8(%rbp)
[4] 0x000000000040052d jle 0x400521 ; <+20> at main.cpp:5
```
which is confusing, as main.cpp:4 appears twice consecutively.
This diff fixes that issue by making the line entry comparison strictly about the line, column and file name. Before it was also comparing the address ranges, which we don't need because our output is strictly about what the user sees in the source.
Besides, I've noticed that the logic that traverses instructions and calculates symbols and disassemblies had too much coupling, and made my changes harder to implement, so I decided to decouple it. Now there are two methods for iterating over the instruction of a trace. The existing one does it on raw load addresses, but the one provides a SymbolContext and an InstructionSP, and does the calculations efficiently (not as efficient as possible for now though), so the caller doesn't need to care about these details. I think I'll be using that iterator to reconstruct the call stacks.
I was able to fix a test with this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100740
This adds support for reading AArch64 Pointer Authentication regset
from elf-core file. Also includes a test-case for the same. Furthermore
there is also a slight refactoring of RegisterContextPOSIXCore_arm64
members and constructor. linux-aarch64-pac.core file is generated using
lldb/test/API/functionalities/postmortem/elf-core/main.c with following
clang arguments:
-march=armv8.5-a -mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf -nostdlib -static -g
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99941
AArch64 kernel builds default to having /smaps and
the "VmFlags" line was added in 3.8. Long before MTE
was supported.
So we can assume that if you're AArch64 with MTE,
you can run this test.
The previous method of checking had a race condition
where the process we read smaps for, could finish before
we get to read the file.
I explored some alternatives but in the end I think
it's fine to just assume we have what we need.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100493
When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit
notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This
patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to
make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
Remove hardcoded platform list for QPassSignals, qXfer:auxv:read
and qXfer:libraries-svr4:read and instead query the process plugin
via the GetSupportedExtensions() API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101241
The test added in D100977 is failing to compile on these platforms. This seems
to be caused by GCC, MSVC and Clang@Windows rejecting the code because
`ToLayout` isn't complete when pointer_to_member_member is declared (even though
that seems to be valid code).
This also reverts the test changes in the lazy-loading test from D100977 as
that failed for the same reason.
Update lldb-server to not use fork or vfork on watchOS and tvOS as these
functions are explicitly marked unavailable there.
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:304:11:
error: 'fork' is unavailable: not available on watchOS
if (fork() == 0)
^
WatchSimulator6.2.sdk/usr/include/unistd.h:447:8: note: 'fork' has been
explicitly marked unavailable here
pid_t fork(void) __WATCHOS_PROHIBITED __TVOS_PROHIBITED;
^
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server/main.cpp:307:11:
error: 'vfork' is unavailable: not available on watchOS
if (vfork() == 0)
^
WatchSimulator6.2.sdk/usr/include/unistd.h:602:8: note: 'vfork' has been
explicitly marked unavailable here
pid_t vfork(void) __WATCHOS_PROHIBITED __TVOS_PROHIBITED;
^
Add a NativeDelegate API to pass new processes (forks) to LLGS,
and support detaching them via the 'D' packet. A 'D' packet without
a specific PID detaches all processes, otherwise it detaches either
the specified subprocess or the main process, depending on the passed
PID.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191
Introduce a NativeProcessProtocol API for indicating support for
protocol extensions and enabling them. LLGS calls
GetSupportedExtensions() method on the process factory to determine
which extensions are supported by the plugin. If the future is both
supported by the plugin and reported as supported by the client, LLGS
enables it and reports to the client as supported by the server.
The extension is enabled on the process instance by calling
SetEnabledExtensions() method. This is done after qSupported exchange
(if the debugger is attached to any process), as well as after launching
or attaching to a new inferior.
The patch adds 'fork' extension corresponding to 'fork-events+'
qSupported feature and 'vfork' extension for 'vfork-events+'. Both
features rely on 'multiprocess+' being supported as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100153
The `--allow-jit` flag allows the user to force the IR interpreter to run the
provided expression.
The `--top-level` flag parses and injects the code as if its in the top level
scope of a source file.
Both flags just change the ExecutionPolicy of the expression:
* `--allow-jit true` -> doesn't change anything (its the default)
* `--allow-jit false` -> ExecutionPolicyNever
* `--top-level` -> ExecutionPolicyTopLevel
Passing `--allow-jit false` and `--top-level` currently causes the `--top-level`
to silently overwrite the ExecutionPolicy value that was set by `--allow-jit
false`. There isn't any ExecutionPolicy value that says "top-level but only
interpret", so I would say we reject this combination of flags until someone
finds time to refactor top-level feature out of the ExecutionPolicy enum.
The SBExpressionOptions suffer from a similar symptom as `SetTopLevel` and
`SetAllowJIT` just silently disable each other. But those functions don't have
any error handling, so not a lot we can do about this in the meantime.
Reviewed By: labath, kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91780
At the moment the expression parser doesn't support evaluating expressions in
static member functions and just pretends the expression is evaluated within a
non-member function. This causes that all static members are inaccessible when
doing unqualified name lookup.
This patch adds support for evaluating in static member functions. It
essentially just does the same setup as what LLDB is already doing for
non-static member functions (i.e., wrapping the expression in a fake member
function) with the difference that we now mark the wrapping function as static
(to prevent access to non-static members).
Reviewed By: shafik, jarin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81550
Ever since Dave Zarzycki's patch to sort test start times based on prior
test timing data (https://reviews.llvm.org/D98179) the test suite aborts
with a SIGHUP. I don't believe his patch is to blame, but rather
uncovers an preexisting issue by making test runs more deterministic.
I was able to narrow down the issue to TestSimulatorPlatform.py. The
issue also manifests itself on the standalone bot on GreenDragon [1].
This patch disables the test until we can figure this out.
[1] http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-standalone/
rdar://76995109
VSCode doesn't render multiple variables with the same name in the variables view. It only renders one of them. This is a situation that happens often when there are shadowed variables.
The nodejs debugger solves this by adding a number suffix to the variable, e.g. "x", "x2", "x3" are the different x variables in nested blocks.
In this patch I'm doing something similar, but the suffix is " @ <file_name:line>), e.g. "x @ main.cpp:17", "x @ main.cpp:21". The fallback would be an address if the source and line information is not present, which should be rare.
This fix is only needed for globals and locals. Children of variables don't suffer of this problem.
When there are shadowed variables
{F16182150}
Without shadowed variables
{F16182152}
Modifying these variables through the UI works
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99989
In certain occasions times, like when LLDB is initializing and
evaluating the .lldbinit files, it tries to print to stderr and stdout
directly. This confuses the IDE with malformed data, as it talks to
lldb-vscode using stdin and stdout following the JSON RPC protocol. This
ends up terminating the debug session with the user unaware of what's
going on. There might be other situations in which this can happen, and
they will be harder to debug than the .lldbinit case.
After several discussions with @clayborg, @yinghuitan and @aadsm, we
realized that the best course of action is to simply redirect stdout and
stderr to the console, without modifying LLDB itself. This will prove to
be resilient to future bugs or features.
I made the simplest possible redirection logic I could come up with. It
only works for POSIX, and to make it work with Windows should be merely
changing pipe and dup2 for the windows equivalents like _pipe and _dup2.
Sadly I don't have a Windows machine, so I'll do it later once my office
reopens, or maybe someone else can do it.
I'm intentionally not adding a stop-redirecting logic, as I don't see it
useful for the lldb-vscode case (why would we want to do that, really?).
I added a test.
Note: this is a simpler version of D80659. I first tried to implement a
RIIA version of it, but it was problematic to manage the state of the
thread and reverting the redirection came with some non trivial
complexities, like what to do with unflushed data after the debug
session has finished on the IDE's side.
This diff ass postRunCommands, which are the counterpart of the preRunCommands. TThey will be executed right after the target is launched or attached correctly, which means that the targets can assume that the target is running.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100340
The test had a race that could cause two threads to end up with the same
"thread local" value. I believe this would not cause the test to fail,
but it could cause it to succeed even when the functionality is broken.
The new implementation removes this uncertainty, and removes a lot of
cruft left over from the time this test was written using pthreads.
This functionality is used exactly once, and it is trivial to implement
it differently (capture into two distinct variables, and compare for
equality afterwards).
By checking for cpu and toolchain features ahead
of time we don't need the custom return codes.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97684
These two functions are doing the same thing, only one of them is
sending the packets immediately and the other "queues" them to be sent
later. The first one is better as in case of errors, the backtrace will
point straight to the place that caused them.
Modify the first method to avoid duplication, and ten standardize on it.
This test is flakey because it tries to read the proc/smaps
file of the first lldb-server process it finds. This process
can finish before we finish doing that.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/96/builds/6634/steps/6/logs/stdio
For now limit this to MTE targets which basically means
QEMU via lldb-dotest, which doesn't have this issue.
I'll fix the race condition shortly.
The annotation is now (since the introduction of @apple_simulator_test)
redundant, and the test could theoretically run on lldb-server too (if
it supported darwin hosts).
These tests fail if you build without the x86 llvm backend.
Either because they use an x86 triple or try to backtrace which
requires some x86 knowledge to see all frames.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100194
This commit has caused the following tests to be flaky:
TestThreadSpecificBpPlusCondition.py
TestExitDuringExpression.py
The exact cause is not known yet, but since both tests deal with
threads, my guess is it has something to do with the tracking of
creation of new threads (which the commit touches upon).
This reverts the following commits:
d01bff8cbdc98fb8751f7bf10af19b47ae5c445d,
ba62ebc48e8c424ce3a78ba01acda679d536dd47,
e761b6b4c58d4f7ae1073d925d7cb321d68ee93a,
a345419ee03095c8cdfbe1c2728467c4da8fa0a4.
The core file used is built for i386 so we
need the x86 backend to be able to load it.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100195
Previously the test would fail if you built on Arm/AArch64
but did not have the x86 llvm backend enabled.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100192
When LLDB's DWARF parser is parsing the member DIEs of a struct/class it
currently fully resolves the types of static member variables in a class before
adding the respective `VarDecl` to the record.
For record types fully resolving the type will also parse the member DIEs of the
respective class. The other way of resolving is just 'forward' resolving the type
which will try to load only the minimum amount of information about the type
(for records that would only be the name/kind of the type). Usually we always
resolve types on-demand so it's rarely useful to speculatively fully resolve
them on the first use.
This patch changes makes that we only 'forward' resolve the types of static
members. This solves the fact that LLDB unnecessarily loads debug information
to parse the type if it's maybe not needed later and it also avoids a crash where
the parsed type might in turn reference the surrounding class that is currently
being parsed.
The new test case demonstrates the crash that might happen. The crash happens
with the following steps:
1. We parse class `ToLayout` and it's members.
2. We parse the static class member and fully resolve its type
(`DependsOnParam2<ToLayout>`).
3. That type has a non-static class member `DependsOnParam1<ToLayout>` for which
LLDB will try to calculate the size.
4. The layout (and size)`DependsOnParam1<ToLayout>` turns depends on the
`ToLayout` size/layout.
5. Clang will calculate the record layout/size for `ToLayout` even though we are
currently parsing it and it's missing it's non-static member.
The created is missing the offset for the yet unparsed non-static member. If we
later try to get the offset we end up hitting different asserts. Most common is
the one in `TypeSystemClang::DumpValue` where it checks that the record layout
has offsets for the current FieldDecl.
```
assert(field_idx < record_layout.getFieldCount());
```
Fixed rdar://67910011
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100180
Watch for fork(2)/vfork(2) (also fork/vfork-style clone(2) on Linux)
notifications and explicitly detach the forked child process, and add
initial tests for these cases. The code covers FreeBSD, Linux
and NetBSD process plugins. There is no new user-visible functionality
provided -- this change lays foundations over subsequent work on fork
support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822
Add a minimal support for the multiprocess extension in gdb-remote
client. It accepts PIDs as part of thread-ids, and rejects PIDs that
do not match the current inferior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99603
A little cleanup to how these firmware corefile tests are done; add
a test that loads a dSYM that loads an OS plugin, and confirm that
the OS plugin's threads are created.
When looking up user specified formatters qualifiers are removed from types before matching,
I have added a clarifying example to the document and added an example to a relevant test to demonstrate this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99827
An empty history entry can happen by entering the expression evaluator an immediately hitting enter:
```
$ lldb
(lldb) e
Enter expressions, then terminate with an empty line to evaluate:
1: <hit enter>
```
The next time the user enters the expression evaluator, if they hit the up arrow to load the previous expression, lldb crashes. This patch treats empty history sessions as a single expression of zero length, instead of an empty list of expressions.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR49845.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100048
The memory read --outfile command should truncate the output when unless
--append-outfile. Fix the bug and add a test.
rdar://76062318
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99890
This reverts commit 602ab188a7e18b97d9af95e17271e8fbee129081.
The patch replicated an lldbassert for a certain type of NSNumber for tagged
pointers. This really shouldn't be an assert since we don't do anything wrong
with these numbers, we just don't print a summary. So this patch changed the
lldbassert to a log message in reverting the revert.
