When referencing `NSObject`, it's enough to import `objc/NSObject.h`. Importing `Foundation` is unnecessary in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99867
Use `@import ObjectiveC` instead of `@import Foundation`, as the former is all
that's needed, and results in fewer clang modules being built.
This results in the following clang modules *not* being built for this test.
ApplicationServices
CFNetwork
ColorSync
CoreFoundation
CoreGraphics
CoreServices
CoreText
DiskArbitration
Dispatch
Foundation
IOKit
ImageIO
Security
XPC
_Builtin_intrinsics
launch
libkern
os_object
os_workgroup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99859
This reverts commit 4d9039c8dc2d1f0be1b5ee486d5a83b1614b038a.
This is causing the greendragon bots to fail most of the time when
running TestNSDictionarySynthetic.py. Reverting until Jim has a chance
to look at this on Monday. Running the commands from that test from
the command line, it fails 10-13% of the time on my desktop.
This is a revert of Jim's changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D99694
Fill out ProcessMachCore::DoLoadCore to handle LC_NOTE hints with
a UUID or with a UUID+address, and load the binary at the specified
offset correctly. Add tests for all four combinations. Change
DynamicLoaderStatic to not re-set a Section's load address in the
Target if it's already been specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99571
rdar://51490545
The ObjC runtime offers both signed & unsigned tagged pointer value
accessors to tagged pointer providers, but lldb's tagged pointer
code only implemented the unsigned one. This patch adds an
emulation of the signed one.
The motivation for doing this is that NSNumbers use the signed
accessor (they are always signed) and we need to follow that in our
summary provider or we will get incorrect values for negative
NSNumbers.
The data-formatter-objc test file had NSNumber examples (along with lots of other
goodies) but the NSNumber values weren't tested. So I also added
checks for those values to the test.
I also did a quick audit of the other types in that main.m file, and
it looks like pretty much all the other values are either intermediates
or are tested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99694
and probably other posix oses. Use extra_images to ensure
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set correctly.
Also take the opportunity to remove hand-rolled library extension
management code in favor of the existing one.
The test uses debug info from one binary to debug a different one. This
does not work on macos, and its pure luck that it works elsewhere (the
variable that it inspects happens to have the same address in both).
The purpose of this test is to verify that lldb has not overwritten the
target executable. That can be more easily achieved by checking the exit
code of the binary, so change the test to do that.
Also remove the llgs_test decorator, as it's preventing the test from
running on macos. All the test needs is the platform functionality of
lldb-server, which is available everywhere.
This fixes flakiness in TestVSCode_launch.test_progress_events
vscode.progress_events some times failed to populate in time for
follow up iterations.
Adding a minor delay before the the for the loop fixes the issue.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99497
Remove the remaining references to LLDB_CAPTURE_REPRODUCER. I removed
the functionality in an earlier commit but forgot that there was a
corresponding test and logic to unset it in our test suite.
This implements the interactive trace start and stop methods.
This diff ended up being much larger than I anticipated because, by doing it, I found that I had implemented in the beginning many things in a non optimal way. In any case, the code is much better now.
There's a lot of boilerplate code due to the gdb-remote protocol, but the main changes are:
- New tracing packets: jLLDBTraceStop, jLLDBTraceStart, jLLDBTraceGetBinaryData. The gdb-remote packet definitions are quite comprehensive.
- Implementation of the "process trace start|stop" and "thread trace start|stop" commands.
- Implementaiton of an API in Trace.h to interact with live traces.
- Created an IntelPTDecoder for live threads, that use the debugger's stop id as checkpoint for its internal cache.
- Added a functionality to stop the process in case "process tracing" is enabled and a new thread can't traced.
- Added tests
I have some ideas to unify the code paths for post mortem and live threads, but I'll do that in another diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91679
This patch adds a test case to test AArch64 dynamic register sets.
This tests for the availability of certain register sets and query
their registers accordingly.
Reviewed By: labath, DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96463
This patch fixes an issue, where if the thread has a signal blocked when
we try to inject it into the process (via vCont), then instead of
executing straight away, the injected signal will trigger another stop
when the thread unblocks the signal.
As (linux) threads start their life with SIGUSR1 (among others)
disabled, and only enable it during initialization, injecting the signal
during this window did not behave as expected. The fix is to change the
test to ensure the signal gets injected with the signal unblocked.
The simplest way to do this was to write a dedicated inferior for this
test. I also created a new header to factor out the function retrieving
the (os-specific) thread id.
As discussed on lldb-dev
<https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-March/016777.html> the
mips code is unmaintained and untested. It also carries a lot of
technical debt which is not limited to mips-specific code.
Generic mips support remains (and is going to be used by the upcoming
freebsd code). Resurrecting mips support should be a matter of re-adding
the relevant register context files (while avoiding reintroducing the
debt).
Add a minimal support for the multiprocess extension in lldb-server.
The server indicates support for it via qSupported, and accepts
thread-ids containing a PID. However, it still does not support
debugging more than one inferior, so any other PID value results
in an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98482
TestVSCode_disconnect.test_launch fails with clean up error because
disconnect gets called twice once from the test case and once from
the tear down hook.
This patch disables disconnect after its been called from test_launch
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99491
This is apparently allowed in Objective-C so we should test this in LLDB.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99513
This is an LLDB test for the ASTImporter crash that got fixed in D99077.
The test is using Clang modules for the properties as it seems the conflicting
names are not actually correctly handled when generating debug information
(only the first property is emitted and the second one is ignored in the current
clang ToT).
LLDB can often appear deadlocked to users that use IDEs when it is indexing DWARF, or parsing symbol tables. These long running operations can make a debug session appear to be doing nothing even though a lot of work is going on inside LLDB. This patch adds a public API to allow clients to listen to debugger events that report progress and will allow UI to create an activity window or display that can show users what is going on and keep them informed of expensive operations that are going on inside LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739
The commit passes the tests on Darwin. The failure on linux shows
that this change was not sufficient to get this setting to work on linux,
but the behavior is the same as before the patch & test, and it caused
no new failures.
So marking the tests as Darwin only till someone can debug the Linux
issue.
The StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction was overriding the synchronous
breakpoint's ShouldStop report. Fix that and add a test.
This fixes two bugs in the original submission:
1) Actually generate both dylibs by including the second one in the Makefile
2) Don't ask synchronous callbacks for their opinion on whether to stop
in the async context, that info is taken care of by recording the m_should_stop
on entry to PerformAction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98914
This patch introduces Scripted Processes to lldb.
The goal, here, is to be able to attach in the debugger to fake processes
that are backed by script files (in Python, Lua, Swift, etc ...) and
inspect them statically.
Scripted Processes can be used in cooperative multithreading environments
like the XNU Kernel or other real-time operating systems, but it can
also help us improve the debugger testing infrastructure by writting
synthetic tests that simulates hard-to-reproduce process/thread states.
Although ScriptedProcess is not feature-complete at the moment, it has
basic execution capabilities and will improve in the following patches.
rdar://65508855
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95713
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This got removed in 68bb51acd572735d80d20adb2c2fc51a5cbbd88e and this enabled
the test on macOS (where it just causes lldb-server to crash). Re-adding the
decorator to get the tests passing again.
This patch introduces Scripted Processes to lldb.
The goal, here, is to be able to attach in the debugger to fake processes
that are backed by script files (in Python, Lua, Swift, etc ...) and
inspect them statically.
Scripted Processes can be used in cooperative multithreading environments
like the XNU Kernel or other real-time operating systems, but it can
also help us improve the debugger testing infrastructure by writting
synthetic tests that simulates hard-to-reproduce process/thread states.
Although ScriptedProcess is not feature-complete at the moment, it has
basic execution capabilities and will improve in the following patches.
rdar://65508855
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95713
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
In order to facilitate the writting of Scripted Processes, this patch
introduces a `ScriptedProcess` python base class in the lldb module.
The base class holds the python interface with all the - abstract -
methods that need to be implemented by the inherited class but also some
methods that can be overwritten.
This patch also provides an example of a Scripted Process with the
`MyScriptedProcess` class.
rdar://65508855
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95712
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
The commit got reverted because the tests were being run twice because
of the overlapping test_exec_root. Pavel has since fixed that in
8248dd91d7f042893d4a605e98d19cb1b89a44d4.
lit has grown a feature where it stores the runtimes of all tests.
Normally, these times should be stored in the build directory, but
because our API tests have set test_exec_root to point to the source
tree, it has ended up polluting our checkout and led to the
.lit_test_times.txt being committed to the repository.
Delete this file, and adjust the exec root of API tests. I've also
needed to adjust the root of Shell tests, in order to avoid the two
overlapping.
In general, it seems like the debugger should allow programs to load & run with
libraries as far as possible, instead of defaulting to being super-picky about
unavailable symbols.
This is critical on macOS/Darwin, as libswiftCore.dylib may 1) export a version
symbol using @available markup and then 2) expect that other exported APIs are
only dynamically used once the version symbol is checked. We can't open a
version of the library built with a bleeding-edge SDK on an older OS without
RTLD_LAXY (or pervasive/expensive @available markup added to dyld APIs).
This was previously committed as cb8c1ee269da and reverted due to
unknown failures on the Linux bots. This version adds additional asserts
to check that the shared objects are where we expect them & that calling
f1() from libt1 produces the expected value. The Linux failure is
tracked by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49656.
See: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-March/016796.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98879
