This reverts commit 0a37163d1d855a2db41e1f46ddbc3f4570bd7ca6.
Reason: Broke the sanitizer msan bots. More details are available in the
original Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106814.
Enable custom insert_subvector for larger vector types.
This is necessary now that SelectionDAG can attempt v3f64 insert
to v4f64, etc.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105385
All floating point values in registers are in double precision
representation. In order to materialize the correct single precision
value, we need to convert the APFloat that represents the value
to double precision first.
Reviewed By: amyk, NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106812
This adds support for the case where
WideSize = DstSize + K * SrcSize
In this case, we can pad the G_MERGE_VALUES instruction with K extra undef
values with width SrcSize. Then the destination can be handled via
widenScalarDst.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106814
Before MASSV only supported P8 and P9 on AIX ans Linux . This patch proposes
MASSV to add support of P7 and P10 only on AIX too.
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106678
Use it AArch64 post-legal combiner. These don't always get folded because when
the instructions are created the constants are obscured by artifacts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106776
When Emscripten EH mixes with Emscripten SjLj, we are not currently
handling some of them correctly. There are three cases:
1. The current function calls `setjmp` and there is an `invoke` to a
function that can either throw or longjmp. In this case, we have to
check both for exception and longjmp. We are currently handling this
case correctly:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L1058-L1090)
When inserting routines for functions that can longjmp, which we do
only for setjmp-calling functions, we check if the function was
previously an `invoke` and handle it correctly.
2. The current function does NOT call `setjmp` and there is an `invoke`
to a function that can either throw or longjmp. Because there is no
`setjmp` call, we haven't been doing any check for functions that can
longjmp. But in that case, for `invoke`, we only check for an
exception and if it is not an exception we reset `__THREW__` to 0,
which can silently swallow the longjmp:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L70-L80)
This CL fixes this.
3. The current function calls `setjmp` and there is no `invoke`. Because
it is not an `invoke`, we haven't been doing any check for functions
that can throw, and only insert longjmp-checking routines for
functions that can longjmp. But in that case, if a longjmpable
function throws, we only check for a longjmp so if it is not a
longjmp we reset `__THREW__` to 0, which can silently swallow the
exception:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L156-L169)
This CL fixes this.
To do that, this moves around some code, so we register necessary
functions for both EH and SjLj and precompute some data (the set of
functions that contains `setjmp`) before doing actual EH or SjLj
transformation.
This CL makes 2nd and 3rd tests in
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/14732 work.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106525
This is a followup patch for D105930 to add implicit-def of RM for
mtfsb[01] instructions as per review comments.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106603
The legalizer generates selects for some operations, which can have constant
condition values, resulting in lots of dead code if it's not folded away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106762
During tail duplication, SSA values may be updated and have their uses
replaced with a virtual register, and any debug instructions that use
that value are deleted. This patch fixes the implementation of the debug
instruction deletion to work correctly for debug instructions that use
the SSA value multiple times, by batching deletions so that we don't
attempt to delete the same instruction twice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106557
For reg+imm SVE addressing mode imm is implictly scaled by VL,
making them impractical for truely immediate offsets. However, if
the offset can be unscaled based on the storage element type we
can use the reg+reg SVE addressing mode and thus either reduce the
number of generate add instructions or replace them with a mov
instruction that can be hoisted from the hot code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106744
This patch adds support for the next-generation arch14
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Detection of arch14 as host processor.
- Assembler/disassembler support for new instructions.
- New LLVM intrinsics for certain new instructions.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10304.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch14
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
Codegen for the raw/struct buffer access intrinsics would update the
offset in the MMO to reflect the combined offset, if it was known to be
constant. If the combined offset was not known to be constant, or if
there was an index, it would set the offset in the MMO to 0. This is
unsafe because it makes it look like the access does not alias with
another access with a fixed non-zero offset.
Fix these cases by setting the pointer in the MMO to null, to reflect
the fact that we do not have any known IR value pointer + constant
offset for the access.
D106284 did this for SelectionDAG. This is the corresponding fix for
GlobalISel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106451
Codegen for the raw/struct buffer access intrinsics would update the
offset in the MMO to reflect the combined offset, if it was known to be
constant. If the combined offset was not known to be constant, or if
there was an index, it would set the offset in the MMO to 0. This is
unsafe because it makes it look like the access does not alias with
another access with a fixed non-zero offset.
Fix these cases by setting the pointer in the MMO to null, to reflect
the fact that we do not have any known IR value pointer + constant
offset for the access.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106284
The register class required for some MVE loads/stores is more
constrained than the register we use when creating postinc. Make sure we
constrain the register class to keep the code correct.
This patch implements vector_splice in tablegen for all cases when the
Immediate is positive and lower than the known minimum value of
a scalable vector.
Vector_splice can be implemented using SVE instruction EXT.
For instance :
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(Vector_1, Vector_2, Imm)
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E>
EXT Vector_1, Vector_2, Imm // Vector_1 = B, C, D + Vector_2 = E
Depends on D105633
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106273
This patch implements vector_splice in tablegen for:
a) when the immediate is equal to -1 (Imm==1) and uses:
INSR + LASTB
For instance :
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(Vector_1, Vector_2, -1)
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <D, E, F, G>
LAST RegLast, Vector_1 // RegLast = D
INSR Res, (Vector_1 >> 1), RegLast // Res = D + E, F, G
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105633
This patch extends support for (scalable-vector) splats in the
DAGCombiner via the `ISD::matchBinaryPredicate` function, which enable a
variety of simple combines of constants.
Users of this function may now have to distinguish between
`BUILD_VECTOR` and `SPLAT_VECTOR` vector operands. The way of dealing
with this in-tree follows the approach added for
`ISD::matchUnaryPredicate` implemented in D94501.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106575
If the rotation amount is a known splat, perform the modulo on the splat source, and then perform the splat. That way the amount-extension performed later by LowerScalarVariableShift can fold the splats away without any multiple-use issues.
Fixes one of the concerns raised on D104156
This is a minimum extension of D106607 to allow folding for
2 non-zero constantsi that can be materialized as immediates..
In the reduced test examples, we save 1 instruction by rolling
the constants into LEA/ADD. In the motivating test from the bullet
benchmark, we absorb both of the constant moves into add ops via
LEA magic, so we reduce by 2 instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106684
As noticed on D105390 - we were hardwiring the depth limit for combining to VPERMI2W/VPERMI2B instructions. Not only had we made the limit too low, we hadn't accounted for slow/fast shuffles via the VariableCrossLaneShuffleDepth control
For types like s96, we don't want to clamp to s64, we want to first widen to
s128 and then narrow it. Otherwise we end up with impossible to legalize types.
I stumbled onto a case where our (sext_inreg (assertzexti32 (fptoui X)), i32)
isel pattern can cause an fcvt.wu and fcvt.lu to be emitted if
the assertzexti32 has an additional user. If we add a one use check
it would just cause a fcvt.lu followed by a sext.w when only need
a fcvt.wu to satisfy both users.
To mitigate this I've added custom isel and new ISD opcodes for
fcvt.wu. This allows us to keep know it started life as a conversion
to i32 without needing to match multiple nodes. ComputeNumSignBits
has been taught that this new nodes produces 33 sign bits. To
prevent regressions when we need to zero extend the result of an
(i32 (fptoui X)), I've added a DAG combine to convert it to an
(i64 (fptoui X)) before type legalization. In most cases this would
happen in InstCombine, but a zero_extend can be created for function
returns or arguments.
To keep everything consistent I've added new nodes for fptosi as well.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106346
